首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Integration of post-combustion capture and storage into a pulverized coal-fired power plant
Authors:Teerawat Sanpasertparnich  Raphael Idem  Irene Bolea  David deMontigny  Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul
Institution:2. Centro de Investigación de Recursos y Consumos Energéticos (CIRCE), Universidad de Zaragoza, Centro Politécnico Superior, María de Luna, 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain;1. School of Applied Sciences & Engineering, Monash University, Churchill 3842, Victoria, Australia;2. Division of Energy Technology, CSIRO, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia;3. Division of Energy Technology, CSIRO, Mayfield West 2304, New South Wales, Australia;1. Department of Energy and Process Engineering, NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway;2. Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
Abstract:Post-combustion CO2 capture and storage (CCS) presents a promising strategy to capture, compress, transport and store CO2 from a high volume–low pressure flue gas stream emitted from a fossil fuel-fired power plant. This work undertakes the simulation of CO2 capture and compression integration into an 800 MWe supercritical coal-fired power plant using chemical process simulators. The focus is not only on the simulation of full load of flue gas stream into the CO2 capture and compression, but also, on the impact of a partial load. The result reveals that the energy penalty of a low capture efficiency, for example, at 50% capture efficiency with 10% flue gas load is higher than for 90% flue gas load at the equivalent capture efficiency by about 440 kWhe/tonne CO2. The study also addresses the effect of CO2 capture performance by different coal ranks. It is found that lignite pulverized coal (PC)-fired power plant has a higher energy requirement than subbituminous and bituminous PC-fired power plants by 40.1 and 98.6 MWe, respectively. In addition to the investigation of energy requirement, other significant parameters including energy penalty, plant efficiency, amine flow rate and extracted steam flow rate, are also presented. The study reveals that operating at partial load, for example at half load with 90% CO2 capture efficiency, as compared with full load, reduces the energy penalty, plant efficiency drop, amine flow rate and extracted steam flow rate by 9.9%, 24.4%, 50.0% and 49.9%, respectively. In addition, the effect of steam extracted from different locations from a series of steam turbine with the objective to achieve the lowest possible energy penalty is evaluated. The simulation shows that a low extracted steam pressure from a series of steam turbines, for example at 300 kPa, minimizes the energy penalty by up to 25.3%.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号