首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Communication in the workplace: Defining the conversations of supervisors
Institution:1. Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash Injury Research Institute, Building 70, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia;2. Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia;3. WorkSafe Victoria, 1 Malop St Geelong VIC 3220, Australia.;1. Center for Transportation Research, University of Tennessee – Knoxville, 600 Henley Street, 309 Conference Center Building, Knoxville, TN 37996-4133, USA;2. Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30030, USA;1. School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu,China;2. National Engineering Laboratory of Integrated Transportation Big Data Application Technology, West Park, High-Tech District, Chengdu, China;3. Department of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States
Abstract:Background: Communications plays a central role in promoting the health and wellbeing of workers. Although much literature has shown the positive benefits of safety communication in the workplace, research has yet to explore the nature of these communication practices within supervisor–worker relationships. This study overcomes this gap in the literature through objectively monitoring communication within the daily working lives of work-group supervisors in one organization. Aims: The aims of the research were to: (a) categorize communication in the workplace into three categories, namely task-related communication, relationship-related communication, and safety-related communication; and (b) explore the frequency of these dialogs. Method: We periodically recorded brief snippets of ambient (acoustic) sounds in supervisors' workplace environment by using an Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR). The EAR was run on an Apple iPod, with an application downloaded for free on iTunes (i.e., iEAR). The EAR was programmed to record for 30 s every three minutes for eight working hours a day of a five-day working week. Results: A total of 12.38 h of acoustic sounds from five workgroup supervisors was useable for coding. The results found examples of task-related (productivity, efficiency, workflow, and human resources) communication, as well as relationship-related (greetings, personal life discussions, workplace relations), and safety-related communication. We also found that the majority of the communication recorded was task-related communication compared with relationship-related and safety-related communication. Practical applications: This research provides preliminary insights into communication practices in the workplace and avenues for future research.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号