超低排放高湿废气总颗粒物监测方法及燃气电厂实际测试

随着我国燃煤电厂等相关行业超低排放改造的推行,固定源排气中可过滤颗粒物(filterable particulate matter,FPM)与气态污染物的排放水平均显著降低,而可凝聚颗粒物(condensable particulate matter,CPM)的排放却日益受到关注.本研究在全面分析了国内外固定源低浓度FPM排放水平下FPM与CPM的测量方法,并在已有研究和实验探索的基础上,对FPM和CPM的监测方法进行了研究,自行开发建立了适合我国实际的超低排放高湿废气中总颗粒物(total particulate matter,TPM)的直接冷凝采样监测方法,并应用于北京市燃气电厂TPM测量.结果表明,北京市燃气电厂排气中TPM排放水平介于1.98～3.77 mg·m^-3之间,平均排放浓度为2.81 mg·m^-3;而FPM的平均排放浓度仅为0.10 mg·m^-3.燃气电厂颗粒物排放以CPM为主,占TPM的比例高达93.8%～99.2%,平均占比为97.0%; FPM占TPM的比例为0.7%～6.2%,平均占比为3.0%...

Monitoring Method of Total Particulate Matter in Ultra-low-emission and High-humidity Exhaust Gas from Stationary Sources and an Actual Test in a Gas Power Plant

With the implementation of ultra-low-emission transformation in coal-fired power plants and other related industries in China, the concentrations of filterable particulate matter (FPM) and gaseous pollutants in exhaust gas from stationary sources have reduced significantly, while the emission of condensable particulate matter (CPM) remains a concern. In this study, the monitoring methods of FPM and CPM at a relatively low FPM concentration in exhaust gas from stationary sources in China and abroad were comprehensively analyzed. On the basis of existing research and experimental exploration, the monitoring methods of FPM and CPM were further studied. A direct condensation sampling and monitoring method for total particulate matter (TPM) in ultra-low-emission and high-humidity exhaust gas from stationary sources, which is suitable for the actual situation in China, was developed and established before being used to measure TPM in exhaust gas from a gas power plant in Beijing. The results showed that the emission concentration of TPM in the exhaust gas from the gas power plant was between 1.98 mg·m^-3 and 3.77 mg·m^-3 (average of 2.81 mg·m^-3), whereas the average emission concentration of FPM was only 0.10 mg·m^-3. The emission type of particulate matter in exhaust gas from the gas power plant was mainly CPM, which accounted for 93.8% to 99.2% of the TPM (average of 97.0%). The proportion of FPM to TPM ranged from 0.7% to 6.2% (average of 3.0%). The emission concentration of filterable CPM was slightly higher than that of FPM.