首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Sequestered defensive toxins in tetrapod vertebrates: principles, patterns, and prospects for future studies
Authors:Alan H Savitzky  Akira Mori  Deborah A Hutchinson  Ralph A Saporito  Gordon M Burghardt  Harvey B Lillywhite  Jerrold Meinwald
Institution:1. Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322-5305, USA
2. Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan
3. Department of Biology, Coastal Carolina University, P.O. Box 261954, Conway, SC, 29528, USA
4. Department of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, Ohio, 44118, USA
5. Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996-0900, USA
6. Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-8525, USA
7. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853-1301, USA
Abstract:Chemical defenses are widespread among animals, and the compounds involved may be either synthesized from nontoxic precursors or sequestered from an environmental source. Defensive sequestration has been studied extensively among invertebrates, but relatively few examples have been documented among vertebrates. Nonetheless, the number of described cases of defensive sequestration in tetrapod vertebrates has increased recently and includes diverse lineages of amphibians and reptiles (including birds). The best-known examples involve poison frogs, but other examples include natricine snakes that sequester toxins from amphibians and two genera of insectivorous birds. Commonalities among these diverse taxa include the combination of consuming toxic prey and exhibiting some form of passive defense, such as aposematism, mimicry, or presumptive death-feigning. Some species exhibit passive sequestration, in which dietary toxins simply require an extended period of time to clear from the tissues, whereas other taxa exhibit morphological or physiological specializations that enhance the uptake, storage, and/or delivery of exogenous toxins. It remains uncertain whether any sequestered toxins of tetrapods bioaccumulate across multiple trophic levels, but multitrophic accumulation seems especially likely in cases involving consumption of phytophagous or mycophagous invertebrates and perhaps consumption of poison frogs by snakes. We predict that additional examples of defensive toxin sequestration in amphibians and reptiles will be revealed by collaborations between field biologists and natural product chemists. Candidates for future investigation include specialized predators on mites, social insects, slugs, and toxic amphibians. Comprehensive studies of the ecological, evolutionary, behavioral, and regulatory aspects of sequestration will require teams of ecologists, systematists, ethologists, physiologists, molecular biologists, and chemists. The widespread occurrence of sequestered defenses has important implications for the ecology, evolution, and conservation of amphibians and reptiles.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号