首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Ethical Tools to Support Systematic Public Deliberations about the Ethical Aspects of Agricultural Biotechnologies
Authors:Volkert Beekman  Frans W A Brom
Institution:(1) Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 29703, 2502 LS The Hague, The Netherlands;(2) Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
Abstract:This special issue of the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics presents so-called ethical tools that are developed to support systematic public deliberations about the ethical aspects of agricultural biotechnologies. This paper firstly clarifies the intended connotations of the term “ethical tools” and argues that such tools can support liberal democracies to cope with the issues that are raised by the application of genetic modification and other modern biotechnologies in agriculture and food production. The paper secondly characterizes the societal discussion on agricultural biotechnology and defends the thesis that normative perspectives fuel this discussion, so one cannot come to grips with this discussion if one neglects these perspectives. The paper thirdly agrues that no such thing exists as “one” societal debate in which these issues should be discussed. There are several interwined debates, and different actors participate in different discourses. Some practical instruments are necessary in order to include the right issues in these debates. These instruments will be coined as “ethical tools,” since they are practical instruments that can be used (tools) in order to support debates and deliberative structures for a systematic engagement with ethical issues (hence, ethical tools). Finally, the paper clarifies the ethics of these ethical tools and presents the tools as discussed in the remainder of this special issue: 1) tools to include ethical issues in public consulation and involvement; 2) tools to support systematic reflection upon ethical issues in decision-making; and 3) tools to support explicit communication about values in the food chain.
Keywords:Ethical tools  GM evaluation  normative perspective  societal debate  values in the food chain  participatory decision-making  communicative space  value pluralism
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号