首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

房采采空区失稳危险性评价
引用本文:李文. 房采采空区失稳危险性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(3)
作者姓名:李文
作者单位:煤炭科学研究总院矿山安全技术研究分院,北京100013;煤炭资源开采与环境保护国家重点实验室,北京100013
基金项目:煤炭资源开采与环境保护国家重点实验室资助
摘    要:由房采采空区失稳引发的灾害已成为危害矿山及社会安全的重要因素之一。为了对房采采空区失稳进行危险性评价,在分析影响房采采空区失稳危险状态的自然地质条件因素与指数W1和开采技术条件因素与指数W2的基础上,采用综合指数法对房采采空区危险源进行分级研究,确定房采采空区失稳危险状态等级评定的综合指数W。将房采采空区失稳危险源分为4级,即Ⅰ级危险源(特大危险性,W≥0.8);Ⅱ级危险源(重大危险性,0.6≤W<0.8);Ⅲ级危险源(较大危险性,0.3≤W<0.6)和Ⅳ级危险源(一般危险性,W<0.3)。结合实例,对陕西某矿区房采采空区失稳危险性进行分级,并提出预防性措施。

关 键 词:综合指数法  自然地质因素  开采技术因素  危险源  分级

Risk Assessment of Room Method Goafs Instability
LI Wen. Risk Assessment of Room Method Goafs Instability[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(3)
Authors:LI Wen
Affiliation:LI Wen1,2(1 Mine Safety Technology Branch,China Coal Research Institute,Beijing 100013,China 2 State Key Lab of Coal Resources Mining and Environment Protection,China)
Abstract:The disaster caused by room method goafs instability has become one of important factors that hurting mines and social security.Based on analysis of natural geological factors and index W1,mining technology factors and index W2 of room method goafs instability danger conditions,classification method of room method goafs hazard was studied with comprehensive index method and the index W was determined.The room method goafs hazard classification was divided into four:Ⅰ-level hazard(extraordinarily serious risk:W≥0.8);Ⅱ-level hazard(serious risk:0.6≤W<0.8);Ⅲ-level hazard(higher risk:0.3≤W<0.6) and Ⅳ-level hazard(general risk:W<0.3).According to the example,the room method goafs hazard in one mining area of Shanxi was classified and corresponding measures was put forward.
Keywords:comprehensive index method  natural geological factors  mining technologic factors  hazard  classification  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号