首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Effects of zooplankton diel vertical migration on a phytoplankton community: A scenario analysis of the underlying mechanisms
Authors:Thomas Petzoldt  Lars Rudolf  Karsten Rinke  Jürgen Benndorf
Institution:1. Plankton Ecophysiology Group, Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Universitario de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de G.C., Canary Islands, Spain;2. Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares, Moll de Ponent s/n, 07015 Palma de Mallorca, Spain;1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS, Changchun, China;2. Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA;3. The Wetland Institute, Stone Harbor, NJ, USA;4. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, CAS, Nanjing, China;1. IPMA, Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Rua C do Aeroporto, 1749-077 Lisbon, Portugal;2. Centre of Oceanography, Faculty of Science, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal;3. CIMAR/CIIMAR — Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, Porto, Portugal;4. Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal;5. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, PL1 3DH Plymouth, UK
Abstract:A mechanistic model was applied to study the influence of diurnal vertical migration (DVM) of planktonic crustaceans on the succession and composition of the phytoplankton community. While zooplankton was restricted to only one functional group, the phytoplankton community was divided into two functional groups which are distinguished by their maximum growth rates and vulnerability to zooplankton grazing. DVM causes a pulsed grazing regime and may also entail a corresponding reduction of the cumulative daily rates of ingestion and losses of zooplankton. To study the relative importance of these two mechanisms of DVM to phytoplankton we performed a scenario analysis consisting of 5 different scenarios. The results show that DVM has a strong influence on the phytoplankton community. Well edible algae benefit during the first 3–4 weeks of summer stratification by reduced daily grazing. The typical shift from small, well edible algae to larger, poorly or non-edible phytoplankton is distinctly delayed. Under the assumption of unchanged daily grazing, however, a pulsed grazing regime has nearly no influence on the resulting phytoplankton composition. As similar effects are also found for completely non-edible phytoplankton, indirect effects via phosphorus availability must be assumed. Thus, the scenario analysis reveals that the observed effects of DVM on phytoplankton can be explained by a combination of two mechanisms: (1) reduction of the daily zooplankton grazing, and (2) changed assimilation and remineralisation of phosphorus. Surprisingly and in contradiction to earlier reports there is almost no DVM effect on phytoplankton due to the sole action of a pulsed grazing regime.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号