Desorption of arsenic from clay and humic acid-coated clay by dissolved phosphate and silicate

Arsenic (As) contaminated aquifers contain iron minerals and clays that strongly bind As at their surfaces. It was suggested that As mobilization is driven by natural organic matter (including fulvic acids (FA) and humic acids (HA)) present in the aquifers either via providing reducing equivalents for reductive dissolution of Fe(III) (hydr)oxides or via competitive desorption of As from the mineral surfaces. In the present study we quantified sorption of As(III) and As(V) to Ca(2+)-homoionized illite (IL) and to kaolinite (Kao) as well as to HA-coated clays, i.e., illite-HA (IL-HA) and kaolinite-HA (Kao-HA) at neutral pH. Clay-HA complexes sorbed 28-50% more As than clay-only systems upon addition of 100μM As(III)/As(V) to 0.5g of clay or HA-clay with Ca(2+) probably playing an important role for HA binding to the clay surface and As binding to the HA. When comparing sorption of As(V) and As(III) to clay and HA-clay complexes, As(V) sorption was generally higher by 15-32% than sorption of As(III) to the same complexes. IL and IL-HA sorbed 11-28% and 6-11% more As compared to Kao and Kao-HA, respectively. In a second step, we then followed desorption of As from Kao, Kao-HA, IL and IL-HA by 100 and 500μM phosphate or silicate both at high (0.41-0.77μmol As/g clay), and low (0.04 to 0.05μmol As/g clay) As loadings. Phosphate desorbed As to a larger extent than silicate regardless of the amount of As loaded to clay minerals, both in the presence and absence of HA, and both for illite and kaolinite. At high loadings of As, the desorption of both redox species of As from clay-HA complexes by phosphate/silicate ranged from 32 to 72% compared to 2-54% in clay only systems meaning that As was desorbed to a larger extent from HA-coated clays compared to clay only systems. When comparing As(III) desorption by phosphate/silicate to As(V) desorption in high As-loading systems, there was no clear trend for which As species is desorbed to a higher extent in the four clay systems meaning that both As species behave similarly regarding desorption from clay surfaces by phosphate/silicate. Similarly, no significant differences were found in high As-loading systems in the amount of As desorbed by phosphate/silicate when comparing Kao vs. IL and Kao-HA vs IL-HA systems meaning that both clay types behave similarly regarding desorption of As by phosphate/silicate. At low As loadings, up to 80% of As was desorbed by phosphate and silicate with no noticeable differences being observed between different As species, different types of clay, clay vs clay-HA or the type of desorbant (phosphate and silicate). The results of this study showed that HA sorption to Ca(2+)-homoionized clay minerals can increase As binding to the clay although the As sorbed to the clay-HA is also released to a greater extent by competing ions such as phosphate and silicate. Desorption of As depended on the initial loadings of As onto the clay/clay-HA. Based on our results, the effect of humic substances on sorption of As and on desorption of As by phosphate and silicate has to be considered in order to fully understand and evaluate the environmental behavior of As in natural environments.