首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


An assessment of ecosystem services of Corbett Tiger Reserve,India
Authors:Ruchi Badola  Syed Ainul Hussain  Bidyut Kumar Mishra  Bidyarani Konthoujam  Sneha Thapliyal  Parag Madhukar Dhakate
Institution:(1) Wildlife Institute of India, Post Box #18, Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand, 248 001, India;(2) Indian Institute of Management, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560076, India;(3) Corbett Tiger Reserve, Ramnagar, Uttarakhand, 244715, India;
Abstract:This paper examines the economic value of selected ecosystem services of Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. The direct cost was derived from secondary sources, and indirect and opportunity costs through socioeconomic surveys. For recreational value the individual approach to travel cost method was used, and to assess carbon sequestration the replacement cost method was used. The maintenance cost of the reserve was estimated as US $2,153,174.3 year−1. The indirect costs in terms of crop and livestock depredation by wild animals ranged from US $2,153,174.3 year−1. The indirect costs in terms of crop and livestock depredation by wild animals ranged from US 2,408 to US $37,958 village−1 over a period of 5 years. The dependence of local communities was for fuel wood (US $37,958 village−1 over a period of 5 years. The dependence of local communities was for fuel wood (US 7,346 day−1), fodder (US $5,290 day−1), small timber, and other nontimber forest products. The recreational value of the reserve was estimated as US $5,290 day−1), small timber, and other nontimber forest products. The recreational value of the reserve was estimated as US 167,619 year−1. With the cost per visitor being US $2.5, the consumers’ surplus was large, showing the willingness of visitors to pay for wildlife recreation. The forests of the reserve mitigate carbon worth US $2.5, the consumers’ surplus was large, showing the willingness of visitors to pay for wildlife recreation. The forests of the reserve mitigate carbon worth US 63.6 million, with an annual flow of US $65.0 ha−1 year−1. The other benefits of the reserve include US $65.0 ha−1 year−1. The other benefits of the reserve include US 41 million through generation of electricity since 1972. The analysis reveals that, though the benefits outweigh costs, they need to be accrued to local communities so as to balance the distribution of benefits and costs.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号