Social and ecological facets of pest management in Honduran subsistence agriculture: implications for IPM extension and natural resource management |
| |
Authors: | Kris A. G. Wyckhuys Robert J. O’Neil |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Horticulture Research Center (CIAA), Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Carretera Central del Norte, 3 kms adelante, de La Caro, Chia (Cundinamarca), Colombia;(2) Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2089, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In subsistence farming systems of the developing world, adoption of resource-conserving practices such as integrated pest management (IPM) is often strikingly low. This has partially been ascribed to researchers’ limited understanding of how technologies develop at the interface of the systems’ social and ecological components. In Honduras (Central America), there exists concern about limited adoption and diffusion of IPM technologies in certain smallholder production systems. In this study, we determine social and ecological drivers of IPM adoption in subsistence maize production in the country’s hillside environment. Honduran small-scale maize production is typified by a key insect pest (the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda) being partly kept at bay through action of a diverse natural enemy complex, including ants, social wasps, carabid beetles, and spiders. Local agricultural landscapes, primarily shaped through shifting cultivation, provide key resources to maintain this natural enemy diversity. These local ecological conditions and related natural enemy abundance strongly influence farmers’ agroecological knowledge and pest management practices. In the meantime, farmer practices are also affected by local communication networks, which help validate and spread IPM concepts and technologies. Based on our findings, we advocate a holistic approach to improve IPM extension through mapping of agroecological opportunities, visualization of regional patterns in farmer knowledge, and associated priority setting. Local IPM capacity could be built through institutional strengthening and adaptive comanagement, while IPM training should be linked with natural resource management initiatives. These approaches may eventually improve the way IPM is delivered to small-scale farmers who operate in the ecologically diverse environments of the tropics. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|