|
|||||
|
|
| 危险度评价法与蒙德法在催化裂化装置中的对比及原因研究 | |
| 引用本文： | 宋文华,吴衍翠,谢飞,李庆功,李克荣.危险度评价法与蒙德法在催化裂化装置中的对比及原因研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(1):108-113. |
| 作者姓名： | 宋文华 吴衍翠 谢飞 李庆功 李克荣 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 天津工业大学,天津,300381 2. 天津工业大学,天津300381;天津市公安消防局,天津300381 3. 天津工业大学,天津300381;中国安全生产科学研究院,北京100012 |
| 基金项目： | 天津市科技计划项目（编号：10ZCGYSF01600）; 国家自然科学基金项目（编号：50974096） |
| 摘 要： | 以催化裂化装置为例子,分别运用危险度评价法与蒙德法两种评价法分别进行评价,得出的评价结论既有共同点也有区别.通过危险度评价法与蒙德法评分项目的比较分析,得出危险度评价法与蒙德法的内在区别与联系,验证了上述例子结论,同时得出蒙德法将危险度评价进行了拓展与延伸,它将危险度评价法得出的危险性高的单元,更深入的找出导致危险性高的原因与参数. |
| 关 键 词： | 危险度 蒙德法 催化裂化装置 |
Contrast and reason research on risk factor appraisal law and mond process in catalytic cracker |
|
| SONG Wen-hua , WU Yan-cui , XIE Fei , LI Qing-gong , LI Ke-rong.Contrast and reason research on risk factor appraisal law and mond process in catalytic cracker[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(1):108-113. | |
| Authors: | SONG Wen-hua WU Yan-cui XIE Fei LI Qing-gong LI Ke-rong |
| Institution: | 1.Tianjin Pol Ytechnic University,Tianjin 300381,China)(2.Tianjin Fire Corps,Tianjin 300381,China)(3.China Academy Of Safety Science And Technology,Beijing 100012,China) |
| Abstract: | Taking the catalytic cracker as an example,the evalnations were conducted by separately using the risk factor appraisal law and the mond process method.The obtained appraisal conclusion had both the common ground and the difference.Through the comparative analysis on grading project risk factor appraisal law and the mond process,the intrinsic difference and the relation of risk factor appraisal law and the mond process was obtained.It confirmed the above example conclusion,and simultaneously it was obtained that the mond process is the development and extend of the risk factor appraisal.It analyzed the unit obtained the risk factor appraisal law,more thorough discovered the reason and the parameter of higher risk. |
| Keywords: | risk factor mond process catalytic cracker |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |