首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Crash risk factors for interstate large trucks in North Carolina
Institution:1. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1005 N. Glebe Road, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22201, United States;2. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States;1. Cambridge Resources International, United States;2. Department of Economics, Queen''s University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada;3. Eastern Mediterranean University, Mersin 10, Turkey;1. Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden;2. Volvo Group Trucks Technology Advanced Technology & Research, Gothenburg, Sweden;3. School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China;1. Technische Universität Chemnitz, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany;2. BMW Group, 80788 München, Germany;1. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States;2. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, United States
Abstract:Introduction: Provide an updated examination of risk factors for large truck involvements in crashes resulting in injury or death. Methods: A matched case–control study was conducted in North Carolina of large trucks operated by interstate carriers. Cases were defined as trucks involved in crashes resulting in fatal or non-fatal injury, and one control truck was matched on the basis of location, weekday, time of day, and truck type. The matched-pair odds ratio provided an estimate of the effect of various driver, vehicle, or carrier factors. Results: Out-of-service (OOS) brake violations tripled the risk of crashing; any OOS vehicle defect increased crash risk by 362%. Higher historical crash rates (fatal, injury, or all crashes) of the carrier were associated with increased risk of crashing. Operating on a short-haul exemption increased crash risk by 383%. Antilock braking systems reduced crash risk by 65%. All of these results were statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Other safety technologies also showed estimated benefits, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: With the exception of the finding that short-haul exemption is associated with increased crash risk, results largely bolster what is currently known about large truck crash risk and reinforce current enforcement practices. Results also suggest vehicle safety technologies can be important in lowering crash risk. This means that as safety technology continues to penetrate the fleet, whether from voluntary usage or government mandates, reductions in large truck crashes may be achieved. Practical application: Results imply that increased enforcement and use of crash avoidance technologies can improve the large truck crash problem.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号