首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Measuring the impact of the pet trade on Indonesian birds
Authors:J Berton C Harris  Morgan W Tingley  Fangyuan Hua  Ding Li Yong  J Marion Adeney  Tien Ming Lee  William Marthy  Dewi M Prawiradilaga  Cagan H Sekercioglu    Suyadi  Nurul Winarni  David S Wilcove
Institution:1. Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.;2. Rainforest Trust, Warrenton, VA, U.S.A.;3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, U.S.A.;4. Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia;5. South‐east Asian Biodiversity Society, Singapore;6. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, U.S.A.;7. Wildlife Conservation Society‐Indonesia Programme, Bogor, Indonesia;8. Division of Zoology, Research Centre for Biology‐LIPI, Bogor, Indonesia;9. Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.A.;10. KuzeyDo?a Derne?i, Ortakap? Mah, Kars, Turkey;11. School of Environment, University of Auckland, Aukland, New Zealand;12. Research Center for Climate Change, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia;13. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.
Abstract:The trade in wild animals involves one‐third of the world's bird species and thousands of other vertebrate species. Although a few species are imperiled as a result of the wildlife trade, the lack of field studies makes it difficult to gauge how serious a threat it is to biodiversity. We used data on changes in bird abundances across space and time and information from trapper interviews to evaluate the effects of trapping wild birds for the pet trade in Sumatra, Indonesia. To analyze changes in bird abundance over time, we used data gathered over 14 years of repeated bird surveys in a 900‐ha forest in southern Sumatra. In northern Sumatra, we surveyed birds along a gradient of trapping accessibility, from the edge of roads to 5 km into the forest interior. We interviewed 49 bird trappers in northern Sumatra to learn which species they targeted and how far they went into the forest to trap. We used prices from Sumatran bird markets as a proxy for demand and, therefore, trapping pressure. Market price was a significant predictor of species declines over time in southern Sumatra (e.g., given a market price increase of approximately $50, the log change in abundance per year decreased by 0.06 on average). This result indicates a link between the market‐based pet trade and community‐wide species declines. In northern Sumatra, price and change in abundance were not related to remoteness (distance from the nearest road). However, based on our field surveys, high‐value species were rare or absent across this region. The median maximum distance trappers went into the forest each day was 5.0 km. This suggests that trapping has depleted bird populations across our remoteness gradient. We found that less than half of Sumatra's remaining forests are >5 km from a major road. Our results suggest that trapping for the pet trade threatens birds in Sumatra. Given the popularity of pet birds across Southeast Asia, additional studies are urgently needed to determine the extent and magnitude of the threat posed by the pet trade.
Keywords:decline  overexploitation  Sumatra  trapping  wild population  wildlife trade  declinació  n  mercado de vida silvestre  població  n silvestre  sobre‐explotació  n  Sumatra  trampeo
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号