首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Engineering meets institutions: an interdisciplinary approach to the management of resilience
Authors:Nader Naderpajouh  " target="_blank">David J Yu  Daniel P Aldrich  Igor Linkov  Juri Matinheikki
Institution:1.School of Property, Construction, and Project Management,Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University),Melbourne,Australia;2.Lyles School of Civil Engineering and Department of Political Science,Purdue University,West Lafayette,USA;3.Department of Political Science,Northeastern University,Boston,USA;4.Carnegie Melon University,Pittsburgh,USA;5.Risk and Decision Science Focus Area Lead, Environmental Laboratory,US Army Engineer Research and Development Center,Vicksburg,USA;6.School of Science,Aalto University,Espoo,Finland;7.School of Property, Construction and Project Management,RMIT University,Melbourne,Australia
Abstract:Resilience management stretches across the decoupled domains of community, corporate, and public governance. As a result, fostering resilience needs a governance structure that supports collective actions and integrates fragmented fields with different institutional frameworks. In this study, we carry out a review of three different perspectives on resilience -engineering, social, and organizational- in order to explore resilience management in the context of governance of infrastructure systems. We discuss the common practices to address resilience of engineering systems, the need and current trend for integration of institutions into these practices through formal (e.g., policies and regulations) as well as informal mechanisms (e.g., trust, norms, and shared cognitive structures). To illustrate our theorizing, we provide three illustrative case studies. The cases highlight the barriers and enablers across the three perspectives and highlight the inter-organizational context of management of resilience. We uncovered organizational dynamics such as the necessity of establishing critical functionality through organizational capacity for stakeholder engagement, the need for diverse organizations to address institutional complexity in management of resilience, and the importance of decoupling in aligning the outcomes of resilience management practices with policies. We suggest an agenda for future research on managing practices associated with management of resilience.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号