Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse, CH-5070 Frick, Switzerland;2. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zürich, Switzerland;1. USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS), National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment (NLAE), 2110 University Boulevard, Ames, IA 50011-3120, United States;2. USDA-ARS, 55670 290th Street, Cambridge, IA 50046, United States;1. Area of Soil Science and Soil Chemistry, ETS Ingenierias Agrarias, University of Valladolid, Avda. de Madrid 54, 34004 Palencia, Spain;2. Sustainable Forest Management Institute, ETS Ingenierias Agrarias, University of Valladolid-INIA, Avda. Madrid 44, 34071 Palencia, Spain;1. Agroscope, Institute for Sustainability Sciences ISS, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland;2. Research Institute for Organic Agriculture, Ackerstrasse, CH-5070 Frick, Switzerland;3. INRA, UMR1208 Ingénierie des Agropolymères et Technologies Emergentes, F-34060 Montpellier, France;5. Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, P.O Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark;1. Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States;2. Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States;1. Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark;2. SEGES, Agro Food Park 15, 8200 Århus N, Denmark;3. International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems (ICROFS), P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark;4. Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera (IFAPA), Centro Alameda del Obispo, Córdoba, Spain;1. Department of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;2. Alterra, Wageningen-UR, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;3. Applied Plant Research (PPO), P.O. Box 430, 8200 AK Lelystad, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | Organic farming systems often comprise crops and livestock, recycle farmyard manure for fertilization, and preventive or biocontrol measures are used for plant protection. We determined indicators for soil quality changes in the DOK long-term comparison trial that was initiated in 1978. This replicated field trial comprises organic and integrated (conventional) farming systems that are typical for Swiss agriculture. Livestock based bio-organic (BIOORG), bio-dynamic (BIODYN) and integrated farming systems (CONFYM) were compared at reduced and normal fertilization intensity (0.7 and 1.4 livestock units, LU) in a 7 year crop rotation. A stockless integrated system is fertilized with mineral fertilizers exclusively (CONMIN) and one control treatment remained unfertilized (NOFERT). The CONFYM system is amended with stacked manure, supplemental mineral fertilizers, as well as chemical pesticides. Manure of the BIOORG system is slightly rotted and in BIODYN it is composted aerobically with some herbal additives. In the third crop rotation period at normal fertiliser intensity soil organic carbon (Corg, w/w) in the plough layer (0–20 cm) of the BIODYN system remained constant and decreased by 7% in CONFYM and 9% in BIOORG as compared to the starting values. With no manure application Corg-loss was severest in NOFERT (22%), followed by CONMIN together with the systems at reduced fertiliser intensity (14–16%). Soil pH tended to increase in the organic systems, whereas the integrated systems had the lowest pH values. At the end of the third crop rotation period in 1998 biological soil quality indicators were determined. Compared to soil microbial biomass in the BIODYN systems the CONFYM soils showed 25% lower values and the systems without manure application were lower by 34%. Relative to the BIODYN soils at the same fertilization intensity dehydrogenase activity was 39–42% lower in CONFYM soils and even 62% lower in soils of CONMIN. Soil basal respiration did not differ between farming systems at the same intensity, but when related to microbial biomass (qCO2) it was 20% higher in CONFYM soils and 52% higher in CONMIN as compared to BIODYN, suggesting a higher maintenance requirement of microbial biomass in soils of the integrated systems. The manure based farming systems of the DOK trial are likely to favour an active and fertile soil. Both, Corg and biological soil quality indicators were clearly depending on the quantity and quality of the applied manure types, but soil microbial biomass and activities were much more affected than Corg. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|