| 定量风险评价（QRA）中的危险辨识方法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗艾民,陈平,多英全,吴宗之.定量风险评价（QRA）中的危险辨识方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(1):54-57. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗艾民 陈平 多英全 吴宗之 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国安全生产科学研究院,北京,100029
2. 北京科技大学机械工程学院,北京,100083 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目(编号:2006BAK01B02)资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 危险辨识是进行定量风险评价（QRA）的关键步骤，QRA分析区域内的危险设备设施可能很多，但并不是每台设备设施都一定要包含并进行定量风险计算，这不仅涉及到QRA的效率和成本问题，也涉及到评价结论准确性、安全投入有效性等问题。本文简要介绍并比较了欧盟ARAMIS和挪威Purple book中推介的2种危险辨识方法，有助于国内QRA分析人员参照比较及提升QRA分析的一致性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 定量风险评价 危险辨识 设备选择 |
Method of hazards identification in quantitative risk assessment |
| |
| LUO Ai-min,CHEN Ping,DUO Ying-quan,WU Zong-zhi.Method of hazards identification in quantitative risk assessment[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2010,6(1):54-57. |
| |
| Authors: | LUO Ai-min CHEN Ping DUO Ying-quan WU Zong-zhi |
| |
| Institution: | 1.China Academy of Safety and Science & Technology/a>;Beijing 100029/a>;China;2.School of Mechanical Engineering/a>;University of Science & Technology Beijing/a>;China |
| |
| Abstract: | Hazards identification,or selection of relevant hazardous equipment,is a critical step in Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA). If too many equipment are selected,the analysis will be unnecessarily time-consuming. On the contrary,if too few equipment are selected,the risk could be under-estimated. ARAMIS method and Purple book method were introduced and compared,which were two tools and choices for industry and regulators who have not yet settled their detailed policies. |
| |
| Keywords: | quantitative risk assessment hazards identification selection of installation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
