首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Cumulative Impacts of Dock Shading on Spartina alterniflora in South Carolina Estuaries
Authors:Denise M.?Sanger  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:sangerdm@dhec.sc.gov"   title="  sangerdm@dhec.sc.gov"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,A. Frederick?Holland,Christopher?Gainey
Affiliation:(1) South Carolina Marine Resources Research Institute, Marine Resources Division/South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 12559, Charleston, South Carolina 29422, USA;(2) Timberland High School, 1418 Gravel Hill Road, St. Stephen, South Carolina 29479, USA
Abstract:Salt marshes dominated by Spartina alterniflora and the associated networks of tidal creeks that drain them are characteristic geographical features of southeastern estuaries, important nursery habitat areas, and preferred sites for residential development. As the size of the coastal population increases, so has the number of requests for dock permits. With each new request for a dock permit, public concerns about the cumulative environmental impacts of dock proliferation on the coastal environment have increased. The objective of this particular study was to evaluate the impacts of shading by dock structures on stem densities of S. alterniflora in South Carolina coastal marshes. Shading impacts under individual docks were extrapolated to the tidal creek (local), county, and statewide scales. Dock structures were sampled both under and next to the walkway in the Charleston Harbor area of South Carolina. The density of S. alterniflora under docks was significantly lower than that which occurred next to the docks (i.e., 5 m away) for the short-form, tall-form, and both forms combined. We estimated that shading effects from dock structures in South Carolina decreased the stem density of S. alterniflora by 71%. Dock shading effects were small when evaluated from the perspective of the amount of marsh that occurs within specific tidal creeks (0.03–0.72%), in coastal counties at a maximum dock length (0.01–0.98%), or statewide (0.01–0.13%) at a maximum dock length. However, approximately 7,000 docks have been permitted over the last decade, resulting in a loss of salt marsh equivalent to 60 ha.1Denise M. Sangerrsquos present address: Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, 1362 McMillan Avenue, Suite 400 Charleston, South Carolina 29405, USA.2 A. Frederick Hollandrsquos present address: Hollings Marine Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, South Carolina 29412, USA.
Keywords:Shading  Tidal creeks  Salt marshes  Density   Spartina alterniflora
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号