Development of Stream Water Chemistry during Spring Melt in a Northern Hardwood Forest |
| |
Authors: | Semkin R. G. Hazlett P. W. Beall F. D. Jeffries D. S. |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) National Water Research Institute, Environment Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada;(2) Great Lakes Forest Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | The role of snowmelt and subsurface hydrology in determiningthe chemistry of a small headwater stream in the TurkeyLakes Watershed (TLW) was evaluated for the spring meltperiods 1992 to 1996. Spring runoff is the dominanthydrological event at the TLW each year. Processesoccurring within the snowpack during snowmelt wereprincipally responsible for the above-ground changes inchemical fluxes relative to bulk deposition (the effect ofwinter throughfall was minimal). Large changes in chemicalfluxes occurred below ground. Organic matter decomposition,weathering, nitrification, and element cycling are some ofthe more important below-ground processes that operateduring the snow accumulation and ablation season and controlthe composition of the water ultimately appearing in thestream. Maximum stream discharge was accompanied byelevated concentrations of H+, NO3-, K+,NH4+, DOC, Al and Mn, but reduced levels ofCa2+, Mg2+, SO42- and SiO2. Theconcentration-discharge relationships were consistent withwater movement through and above the forest floor duringpeak discharge, a flowpath facilitated by rapid infiltrationof meltwater and the existence of a relatively impermeablelayer in the mineral soil creating a perched water table. Averaged over the five periods of snow accumulation andablation, it was estimated that pre-melt stream flow, andwater routed through the forest floor and through the uppermineral soil contributed 9, 28 and 63%, respectively, ofthe discharge measured at the outlet of the catchment. Theforest floor contribution would be greater at peak dischargeand at higher elevations. An end-member mixing modelestimated concentrations of SO42-, NO3-,Cl-, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ and Al that werecomparable to average values measured in the stream. Othervariables (NH4+, H+, K+ and DOC) wereover-estimated implying retention mechanisms operatingoutside the model assumptions. |
| |
Keywords: | bulk deposition flow paths snowmelt soilwater stream water throughfall |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|