首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Contribution of Systematic Reviews to Management Decisions
Authors:CARLY N COOK  HUGH P POSSINGHAM  RICHARD A FULLER
Institution:1. Quantitative and Applied Ecology Group, The School of Botany, University of Melbourne, , Parkville, Victoria, 3010 Australia;2. School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, , Brisbane, Queensland, 4072 Australia
Abstract:Systematic reviews comprehensively summarize evidence about the effectiveness of conservation interventions. We investigated the contribution to management decisions made by this growing body of literature. We identified 43 systematic reviews of conservation evidence, 23 of which drew some concrete conclusions relevant to management. Most reviews addressed conservation interventions relevant to policy decisions; only 35% considered practical on‐the‐ground management interventions. The majority of reviews covered only a small fraction of the geographic and taxonomic breadth they aimed to address (median = 13% of relevant countries and 16% of relevant taxa). The likelihood that reviews contained at least some implications for management tended to increase as geographic coverage increased and to decline as taxonomic breadth increased. These results suggest the breadth of a systematic review requires careful consideration. Reviews identified a mean of 312 relevant primary studies but excluded 88% of these because of deficiencies in design or a failure to meet other inclusion criteria. Reviews summarized on average 284 data sets and 112 years of research activity, yet the likelihood that their results had at least some implications for management did not increase as the amount of primary research summarized increased. In some cases, conclusions were elusive despite the inclusion of hundreds of data sets and years of cumulative research activity. Systematic reviews are an important part of the conservation decision making tool kit, although we believe the benefits of systematic reviews could be significantly enhanced by increasing the number of reviews focused on questions of direct relevance to on‐the‐ground managers; defining a more focused geographic and taxonomic breadth that better reflects available data; including a broader range of evidence types; and appraising the cost‐effectiveness of interventions. Contribuciones de las Revisiones Sistemáticas a las Decisiones de Manejo
Keywords:conservation management  conservation policy  decision making  environmental evidence  evidence‐based conservation  implementation gap  brecha de implementació  n  conservació  n basada en evidencias  evidencia ambiental  manejo de conservació  n  polí  tica de conservació  n  toma de decisiones
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号