首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting
Authors:EDWARD T GAME  PETER KAREIVA  HUGH P POSSINGHAM
Institution:1. Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy, , West End, QLD, 4101 Australia;2. Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy, , Seattle, WA, 98105 U.S.A.;3. Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, , St. Lucia, QLD, 4072 Australia
Abstract:A vast number of prioritization schemes have been developed to help conservation navigate tough decisions about the allocation of finite resources. However, the application of quantitative approaches to setting priorities in conservation frequently includes mistakes that can undermine their authors’ intention to be more rigorous and scientific in the way priorities are established and resources allocated. Drawing on well‐established principles of decision science, we highlight 6 mistakes commonly associated with setting priorities for conservation: not acknowledging conservation plans are prioritizations; trying to solve an ill‐defined problem; not prioritizing actions; arbitrariness; hidden value judgments; and not acknowledging risk of failure. We explain these mistakes and offer a path to help conservation planners avoid making the same mistakes in future prioritizations. Seis Errores Comunes en la Definición de Prioridades de Conservación
Keywords:Conservation Action Planning  conservation planning  decision science  measurement theory  operations research  prioritization  ciencia de la decisió  n  investigació  n de operaciones  Planificació  n de Acciones de Conservació  n  planificació  n de la conservació  n  priorizació  n  teorí  a de medidas
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号