首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Great Basin Land Management Planning Using Ecological Modeling
Authors:Tara A Forbis  Louis Provencher  Leonardo Frid  Gary Medlyn
Institution:(1) The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, P.O. Box 150266, Ely, Nevada 89315, USA;(2) The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, One E. First Street, Suite 1007, Reno, Nevada 89501, USA;(3) ESSA Technologies, 1765 West 8th Avenue, Suite 300, Vancouver, BC, V6J 5C6, Canada;(4) Bureau of Land Management, Ely Field Office, 702 North Industrial Way, HC 33, Box 33500, Ely, Nevada 89301, USA
Abstract:This report describes a land management modeling effort that analyzed potential impacts of proposed actions under an updated Bureau of Land Management Resource Management Plan that will guide management for 20 years on 4.6 million hectares in the Great Basin ecoregion of the United States. State-and-transition models that included vegetation data, fire histories, and many parameters (i.e., rates of succession, fire return intervals, outcomes of management actions, and invasion rates of native and nonnative invasive species) were developed through workshops with scientific experts and range management specialists. Alternative restoration scenarios included continuation of current management, full fire suppression, wildfire use in designated fire use zones, wildfire use in resilient vegetation types only, restoration with a tenfold budget increase, no restoration treatments, and no livestock grazing. Under all the scenarios, cover of vegetation states with native perennial understory declined and was replaced by tree-invaded and weed-dominated states. The greatest differences among alternative management scenarios resulted from the use of fire as a tool to maintain native understory. Among restoration scenarios, only the scenario assuming a tenfold budget increase had a more desirable outcome than the current management scenario. Removal of livestock alone had little effect on vegetation resilience. Rather, active restoration was required. The predictive power of the model was limited by current understanding of Great Basin vegetation dynamics and data needs including statistically valid monitoring of restoration treatments, invasiveness and invasibility, and fire histories. The authors suggest that such computer models can be useful tools for systematic analysis of potential impacts in land use planning. However, for a modeling effort to be productive, the management situation must be conducive to open communication among land management agencies and partner entities, including nonprofit organizations.
Keywords:Community dynamics  Federal lands  Grazing management  Great Basin  Prescribed fire  Rangeland  Resilience  Thresholds  Wildfire
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号