Evaluating weather effects on interannual variation in net ecosystem productivity of a coastal temperate forest landscape: A model intercomparison |
| |
Authors: | Z. WangR.F. Grant M.A. ArainB.N. Chen N. CoopsR. Hember W.A. KurzD.T. Price G. StinsonJ.A. Trofymow J. Yeluripati Z. Chen |
| |
Affiliation: | a Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E3 b School of Geography and Earth Sciences and McMaster Centre for Climate Change, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada c Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada d Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC, Canada e Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Edmonton, Alta., Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Forest productivity is strongly affected by seasonal weather patterns and by natural or anthropogenic disturbances. However weather effects on forest productivity are not currently represented in inventory-based models such as CBM-CFS3 used in national forest C accounting programs. To evaluate different approaches to modelling these effects, a model intercomparison was conducted among CBM-CFS3 and four process models (ecosys, CN-CLASS, Can-IBIS and 3PG) over a 2500 ha landscape in the Oyster River (OR) area of British Columbia, Canada. The process models used local weather data to simulate net primary productivity (NPP), net ecosystem productivity (NEP) and net biome productivity (NBP) from 1920 to 2005. Other inputs used by the process and inventory models were generated from soil, land cover and disturbance records. During a period of intense disturbance from 1928 to 1943, simulated NBP diverged considerably among the models. This divergence was attributed to differences among models in the sizes of detrital and humus C stocks in different soil layers to which a uniform set of soil C transformation coefficients was applied during disturbances. After the disturbance period, divergence in modelled NBP among models was much smaller, and attributed mainly to differences in simulated NPP caused by different approaches to modelling weather effects on productivity. In spite of these differences, age-detrended variation in annual NPP and NEP of closed canopy forest stands was negatively correlated with mean daily maximum air temperature during July-September (Tamax) in all process models (R2 = 0.4-0.6), indicating that these correlations were robust. The negative correlation between Tamax and NEP was attributed to different processes in different models, which were tested by comparing CO2 fluxes from these models with those measured by eddy covariance (EC) under contrasting air temperatures (Ta). The general agreement in sensitivity of annual NPP to Tamax among the process models led to the development of a generalized algorithm for weather effects on NPP of coastal temperate coniferous forests for use in inventory-based models such as CBM-CFS3: NPP′ = NPP − 57.1 (Tamax − 18.6), where NPP and NPP′ are the current and temperature-adjusted annual NPP estimates from the inventory-based model, 18.6 is the long-term mean daily maximum air temperature during July-September, and Tamax is the mean value for the current year. Our analysis indicated that the sensitivity of NPP to Tamax was nonlinear, so that this algorithm should not be extrapolated beyond the conditions of this study. However the process-based methodology to estimate weather effects on NPP and NEP developed in this study is widely applicable to other forest types and may be adopted for other inventory based forest carbon cycle models. |
| |
Keywords: | 3PG, Physiological Principles Predicting Growth AGC, above-ground biomass C APAR, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation BGC, below-ground C (live roots, dead roots, and soil) CBM-CFS3, Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Service CCP, Canadian Carbon Program CN-CLASS, Carbon-Nitrogen coupled version of the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Can-IBIS, Canadian version of the Integrated Biosphere Simulator D, vapor pressure deficit DF49, FCRN flux tower site in a Douglas-fir stand at OR that regenerated in 1949 DOM, dead organic matter C EC, eddy covariance ?g, gross photosynthetic efficiency FCRN, Fluxnet Canada Research Network GIS, geographic information system GPP, gross primary productivity gc, canopy conductance gl, leaf conductance J, electron transport rate LAI, leaf area index LE, latent heat flux MAT, mean annual air temperature MSC, Meteorological Service of Canada NPP, net primary productivity NEP, net ecosystem productivity NBP, net biome productivity OR, Oyster River region of Vancouver Island Ωa, root axial resistance Ωr, root radial resistance PFT, plant functional type Ra, autotrophic respiration Re, ecosystem respiration Rg, growth respiration Rh, heterotrophic respiration RMSD, root mean square for difference Rm, maintenance respiration SDC, surface dead organic C (standing dead, stumps, down woody debris, forest floor) SLC, Soil Landscapes of Canada Ta, air temperature Tamax, mean daily maximum air temperature during July-September Tc, canopy temperature Ts, soil temperature θs, available water content in soil Vr, rubisco-limited CO2 fixation rate ψr, root water potential ψT, canopy turgor potential ψC, canopy water potential |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|