首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

天津市不同后备水资源对比评价研究
引用本文:李晓峰,张宏业,邓小文,高鹭,王媛.天津市不同后备水资源对比评价研究[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(1):16-23.
作者姓名:李晓峰  张宏业  邓小文  高鹭  王媛
作者单位:1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100049;
2. 中国科学院研究生院,北京100875;
3. 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院 北京100101;
4. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳110016
基金项目:中国科学院资助项目;科技部专项基金;科技部专项基金
摘    要:为了缓解天津水资源严重短缺的困境,利用层次分析法,从水资源保证程度、调水协调难度、可供水量、工程成本、供水管网改造成本、水质、水处理成本、污水处理难度、生态环境风险等角度对天津市主要后备水源进行了综合对比评价。评价结果认为海水淡化、南水北调中线调水、地下咸水开发、海水直接利用可以作为天津市理想的后备水资源开发方案;上游水库调水、南水北调东线调水、引黄调水可以作为应急后备水源方案;污水处理后主要用作灌溉、生态、景观用水。

关 键 词:水资源  后备水资源  层次分析法  综合评价  
文章编号:1000-3037(2006)01-0016-08
收稿时间:4/7/2005 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:2005-09-21

Comparative Study on Potential Water Resources for Tianjin
LI Xiao-feng,ZHANG Hong-ye,DENG Xiao-wen,GAO Lu,WANG Yuan.Comparative Study on Potential Water Resources for Tianjin[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2006,21(1):16-23.
Authors:LI Xiao-feng  ZHANG Hong-ye  DENG Xiao-wen  GAO Lu  WANG Yuan
Institution:1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS,Beijing 100101,China;
2. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;
3. Institute of Applied Ecology,CAS,Shenyang 110016,China;
4. School of Geography and Remote Sensing,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China
Abstract:As a city with serious water shortage problem,Tianjin has an urgent need to find new water sources in order to meet the growing demand for water supply.The standby water sources schemes in Tianjin include middle and east routes of south to north water transferring from Yangtze River,importing water from Yellow River,redeploying water from upstream reservoirs of Haihe River,effluent reuse,seawater for direct use,seawater desalination,saline ground water development,etc.In our research,we use analytic hierarchy process to evaluate these schemes with a comprehensive analysis on nine factors,including water supply,difficulty of water source sharing,annual volume of water supply,cost of engineering construction,quality of water,cost of water treatment,cost of water supply pipelines reticulation,handicap of wastewater disposal process and risk of eco-environment.First we analyzed each scheme with the nine factors.Then we used Delphi technique to decide the relative importance of these factors and got a judgment matrix to acquire the weight of them.As a result,seawater desalination got the highest value with the virtue of huge quantity of reserves,high quality of water supply,low ecological and climatic risks and short distance of intake.The middle route water transfer project,saline ground water and direct use of seawater also got higher mark profiting from large reserves,extensive and lower cost.The comparative assessment result indicates that these four schemes are felicitous water sources for municipal utilization in Tianjin.The east route water transfer project,redeploying water from upstream reservoirs and importing water from Yellow River got lower values with disadvantage of water pollution or serious regional contest.They can be only treated as contingent water sources.Although sewage disposal got the lowest mark because of high cost of treatment and supply pipelines construction,sewage treatment must be given priority to be used in irrigation,ecological and landscape demand.
Keywords:water resource  standby water sources  analytic hierarchy process  comprehensive assessment
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《自然资源学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《自然资源学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号