首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

生物效应比(BER)技术预测我国水生生物基准探讨
引用本文:王晓南,闫振广,刘征涛,王婉华,张聪.生物效应比(BER)技术预测我国水生生物基准探讨[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(1):276-285.
作者姓名:王晓南  闫振广  刘征涛  王婉华  张聪
作者单位:1. 中国环境科学研究院, 环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室, 国家环境保护化学品生态效应与风险评估重点实验室, 北京 100012; 2. 中海石油环保服务有限公司, 天津 300452
基金项目:国家水体污染与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX07501-003-06);环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室自由探索基金(SKLECRA2014OFP06)
摘    要:基于中国与美国间生物敏感性的差异,对生物效应比(BER)技术预测我国水生生物基准值进行了研究.首先,对中美共有的且急性生物毒性数据符合3门8科的污染物进行筛选,然后,依据两国物种的敏感性与代表性建立基于不同生物组合的BER技术,最后,对不同生物组合BER技术预测水生生物急性基准值与实测基准值进行比较与分析,筛选出预测效果较好的BER技术.结果表明:共筛选出9个中美共有且毒性数据丰富的污染物(As(III)、Cr(VI)、Hg、Cu、Zn、Pb、对硫磷、毒死蜱和三丁基锡),依据本土生物毒性数据推导出该9种污染物的我国水生生物急性基准值分别为201.72、2.64、0.74、1.32、55.83、92.25、0.12、0.36和0.38μg/L.此外,在对7种生物组合方式BER技术的预测效果进行分析比较的基础上,初步提出基于同属或科的生物组合方式的BER技术可较好地对9种污染物的本土水生生物急性基准值进行预测.研究结果可为在本土生物毒性数据缺乏时充分利用现有毒性数据或进行少量毒性试验的基础上对我国水生生物急性基准值的预测提供帮助.

关 键 词:生物效应比  水生生物基准  预测基准值  中国  美国  
收稿时间:2015-05-26

Study of using biological effect ratio (BER) method to predict the aquatic life criteria in China
WANG Xiao-nan,YAN Zhen-guang,LIU Zheng-tao,WANG Wan-hua,ZHANG Cong.Study of using biological effect ratio (BER) method to predict the aquatic life criteria in China[J].China Environmental Science,2016,36(1):276-285.
Authors:WANG Xiao-nan  YAN Zhen-guang  LIU Zheng-tao  WANG Wan-hua  ZHANG Cong
Institution:1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Effects and Risk Assessment of Chemicals, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; 2. China Offshore Environmental Services Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300452, China
Abstract:In this study, predicted aquatic life criteria using biological effect ratio (BER) method based on the difference of species sensitivity between China and the USA was investigated. First, pollutants with acute toxicity data from 3Phyla and 8Families that both in China and the USA were selected. Second, the different biological groups were developed for BER method based on the sensitivity and representation of species of the two countries. Third, effective BER method was selected based on the comparison of predicted criteria maximum concentration (CMC) and the measured CMC. Results showed that: 9pollutants of As(III), Cr(VI), Hg, Cu, Zn, Pb, parathion, chlorpyrifos and TBT both in China and the USA were selected, and the measured CMCs for protecting the Chinese native aquatic species were derived to be 201.72, 2.64, 0.74, 1.32, 55.83, 92.25, 0.12, 0.36 and 0.38μg/L, respectively. Moreover, comparison of predicted criteria and the measured criteria of 7different biological groups for BER method showed that BER method of biological groups based on the same genera or family could predict the CMCs of 9pollutants in China well. The result of this study could provide useful information for predicting CMC making full use of the existed toxicity data or just carrying out less toxicity test when toxicity data of native species is lacking.
Keywords:biological effect ratio (BER)  aquatic life criteria  predicted criteria  China  USA  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号