| 2014~2016年间郑州市控制PM10和PM2.5污染的健康效益评估 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 韩士杰,王佳,燕启社,杨留明,赵庆炎,王申博,李晨,张轶舜,张瑞芹.2014~2016年间郑州市控制PM10和PM2.5污染的健康效益评估[J].环境科学,2019,40(6):2565-2571. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 韩士杰 王佳 燕启社 杨留明 赵庆炎 王申博 李晨 张轶舜 张瑞芹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 环境科学研究院, 郑州 450001,郑州大学公共卫生学院, 郑州 450001,郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 环境科学研究院, 郑州 450001,郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 环境科学研究院, 郑州 450001,郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 环境科学研究院, 郑州 450001,郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 环境科学研究院, 郑州 450001,郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 环境科学研究院, 郑州 450001,郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 环境科学研究院, 郑州 450001,郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 环境科学研究院, 郑州 450001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0212400） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 根据郑州市2014~2016年间大气中PM10和PM2.5年平均浓度数值，采用泊松回归相对危险模型，评估了控制PM10和PM2.5污染后所能带来的95%置信区间下的健康效应及健康效益.结果表明，2014~2016年间，PM10浓度达到二级限值后所带来的经济效益（以亿元计，括号中为置信区间，下同）分别为181.8（150.4，211.2）、242.5（202.5，279.4）和206.2（173.3，239.2），分别占郑州市当年生产总值的2.7%、3.3%和2.5%；PM2.5浓度达标后所带来的经济效益分别为178.8（143.7，211.6）、216.5（174.6，255.3）和172.5（137.8，205.5），分别占郑州市当年生产总值的2.6%、3.0%和2.1%.PM10和PM2.5浓度达标后，城镇受益人数高于农村，急性支气管炎减少人数高于其他健康终端，对于慢性支气管炎，成人受益比儿童大，哮喘则相反.慢性支气管炎人数减少带来的健康经济效益最高，其次为哮喘，门诊和住院的健康效益最低.
|
| 关 键 词： | PM10和PM2.5 健康效应 健康效益 城镇 乡村 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018/10/30 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2019/1/7 0:00:00 |
Health Benefit Evaluation for PM10 and PM2.5 Pollution Control in Zhengzhou, China, 2014-2016 |
| |
| HAN Shi-jie,WANG Ji,YAN Qi-she,YANG Liu-ming,ZHAO Qing-yan,WANG Shen-bo,LI Chen,ZHANG Yi-shun and ZHANG Rui-qin.Health Benefit Evaluation for PM10 and PM2.5 Pollution Control in Zhengzhou, China, 2014-2016[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2019,40(6):2565-2571. |
| |
| Authors: | HAN Shi-jie WANG Ji YAN Qi-she YANG Liu-ming ZHAO Qing-yan WANG Shen-bo LI Chen ZHANG Yi-shun and ZHANG Rui-qin |
| |
| Institution: | Research Institute of Environmental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China,College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China,Research Institute of Environmental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China,Research Institute of Environmental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China,Research Institute of Environmental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China,Research Institute of Environmental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China,Research Institute of Environmental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China,Research Institute of Environmental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China and Research Institute of Environmental Science, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the annual average concentration values, the health effects and health benefits as well as 95% confidence intervals of PM10 and PM2.5 pollution control from 2014 to 2016 in Zhengzhou were evaluated by applying the Poisson regression relative risk model. Results showed that the health benefits of PM10 pollution control were 18.18 billion RMB (15.04, 21.12), 24.25 billion RMB (20.25, 27.94), and 20.62 billion RMB (17.33, 23.92), which accounted for 2.7%, 3.3%, and 2.5% of the GDP of Zhengzhou, respectively, in 2014-2016. The health benefits of PM2.5 pollution control were 17.88 billion RMB (14.37, 21.16), 21.65 billion RMB (17.46, 25.53), and 17.25 billion RMB (13.78, 20.55), which accounted for 2.6%, 3.0%, and 2.1% of the GDP of Zhengzhou, respectively, in 2014-2016. After the PM10 and PM2.5 pollution was controlled, the number of urban beneficiaries was higher than that of rural areas, and acute bronchitis beneficiaries were higher than the beneficiaries of other health end-points. For chronic bronchitis, adults benefited more than children, while the opposite occurred for asthma. In this study, chronic bronchitis had the highest health benefit, followed by asthma, and outpatient and inpatient setting had the lower health benefits. |
| |
| Keywords: | PM10and PM2 5 health effects health benefit urban rural |
|
| 点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
