首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Robust technology policy against emission leakage: The case of upstream subsidies
Institution:1. Resources for the Future, Gothenburg University, FEEM, CESifo Research Network;2. Statistics Norway, CREE and CESifo Research Network;3. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, CREE and CESifo Research Network;1. Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan;2. Department of Economics, Soochow University, Taiwan;1. School of Economics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland;2. Erudite, University of Paris-Est Créteil. 61 av du Général de Gaulle, 94010 Créteil Cedex, France;1. Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse Capitol (INRA), France;2. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Abstract:Asymmetric regulation of a global pollutant between countries can alter the competitiveness of industries and lead to emissions leakage, which hampers countries’ welfare. In order to limit leakage, governments consider supporting domestic trade-exposed firms by subsidizing their investments in abatement technology. The suppliers of such technologies tend to be less than perfectly competitive, particularly when both emissions regulations and advanced technologies are new. In this context of twin market failures, we consider the relative effects and desirability of subsidies for abatement technology. We find a more robust recommendation for upstream subsidies than for downstream subsidies. Downstream subsidies tend to increase global abatement technology prices, reduce pollution abatement abroad and increase emission leakage. On the contrary, upstream subsidies reduce abatement technology prices, and hence also emissions leakage.
Keywords:Emission leakage  Strategic environmental policy  Abatement subsidies  Asymmetric carbon taxes
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号