首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

上海城市河流温室气体排放特征及其影响因素
引用本文:常思琦,王东启,俞 琳,任名成,胡蓓蓓,陈振楼.上海城市河流温室气体排放特征及其影响因素[J].环境科学研究,2015,28(9):1375-1381.
作者姓名:常思琦  王东启  俞 琳  任名成  胡蓓蓓  陈振楼
作者单位:1.华东师范大学地理科学学院, 地理信息科学教育部重点实验室, 上海 200241
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(40903049,41301221,41473094)
摘    要:为研究城区和郊区河流3种温室气体(N2O、CH4和CO2)排放通量的差异,分别于春季(2013年4月)、夏季(2013年7月)、秋季(2013年10月)和冬季(2014年1月),利用浮箱法和扩散模型法对上海市城区河流(苏州河)和郊区河流(淀浦河)的温室气体排放通量进行了观测;并探讨了人类活动干扰下环境因子对温室气体排放的影响. 结果表明:研究区内2条河流是温室气体的排放源,城区河流N2O和CH4的扩散排放通量和浮箱排放通量年均值均比郊区河流大1~2个量级, CO2两种排放通量在城郊区2条河流的年均值相当. 苏州河N2O、CO2和CH4扩散排放通量年均值分别为15.88、6 748.27和84.98 μmol/(m2·h);淀浦河分别为0.61、2 978.98和9.61 μmol/(m2·h). 苏州河N2O、CO2和CH4浮箱排放通量年均值为15.77、4 041.61和6 721.08 μmol/(m2·h);淀浦河为0.60、1 214.77和59.58 μmol/(m2·h). 城市河流呈现出高氮负荷及缺氧的特征,是影响中心城区河流N2O、CO2和CH4扩散排放通量偏高的重要因素. CH4浮箱排放通量和扩散排放通量的差异显示,城市河流中的富碳氮缺氧环境条件有利于随机气泡排放的发生,增强了温室气体的排放. 

关 键 词:温室气体    排放通量    城市河流    上海

Greenhouse Gas Emission Characteristics from Urban Rivers in Shanghai
CHANG Siqi,WANG Dongqi,YU Lin,REN Mingcheng,HU Beibei and CHEN Zhenlou.Greenhouse Gas Emission Characteristics from Urban Rivers in Shanghai[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2015,28(9):1375-1381.
Authors:CHANG Siqi  WANG Dongqi  YU Lin  REN Mingcheng  HU Beibei and CHEN Zhenlou
Institution:1.Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science of the Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China2.School of Urban and Environmental Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
Abstract:The floating chamber and diffusive models were used to investigate the differences of greenhouse gas (N2O, CH4 and CO2) fluxes between an urban river (Suzhou River) and a suburban river (Dianpu River) in Shanghai during April, July and October in 2013 and January in 2014. The influence of environmental variables on greenhouse gas emissions under the disturbance of anthropogenic activities was also discussed. The results demonstrated that the two rivers were main sources of N2O, CH4 and CO2. N2O and CH4 fluxes from the urban river were one to two magnitudes higher than those from the suburban river. CO2 fluxes from the two rivers were at the same magnitude. Estimated annual N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes by the diffusive model were 15.88,6748.27 and 84.98 μmol/(m2·h) in Suzhou River, and 0.61,8.98 and 9.61 μmol/(m2·h) in Dianpu River. Estimated annual N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes by the floating chamber method were 15.77,1.61 and 6721.08 μmol/(m2·h) in Suzhou River, and 0.60,4.77 and 59.58 μmol/(m2·h) in Dianpu River. Significant correlations between dissolved oxygen, nitrate, ammonium and N2O fluxes indicated that the enrichment of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and depletion of oxygen might enhance microbial denitrification, resulting in high N2O fluxes from the urban river. At the same time, high emissions of CH4 occurred in hypoxia conditions in the urban river. Water temperature greatly controlled CO2 fluxes, probably through stimulating the microbial activities of CO2 production. The difference between floating chamber and diffusive model fluxes of CH4 indicated that the nitrogen-rich and oxygen-deficit conditions in urban river were favorable for bubble events, which could enhance CH4 emission. 
Keywords:greenhouse gas  flux  urban river  Shanghai
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号