首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Cost shifting and other perverse incentives in biodiversity offsetting in India
Authors:Divya Narain  Martine Maron
Institution:1. Independent Researcher, India;2. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Abstract:Biodiversity offsetting aims to compensate for development‐induced biodiversity loss through commensurate conservation gains and is gaining traction among governments and businesses. However, cost shifting (i.e., diversion of offset funds to other conservation programs) and other perverse incentives can undermine the effectiveness of biodiversity offsetting. Additionality—the requirement that biodiversity offsets result in conservation outcomes that would not have been achieved otherwise—is fundamental to biodiversity offsetting. Cost shifting and violation of additionality can go hand in hand. India's national offsetting program is a case in point. Recent legislation allows the diversion of offset funds to meet the country's preexisting commitments under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). With such diversions, no additional conservation takes place and development impacts remain uncompensated. Temporary additionality cannot be conceded in light of paucity of funds for preexisting commitments unless there is open acknowledgement that fulfillment of such commitments is contingent on offset funds. Two other examples of perverse incentives related to offsetting in India are the touting of inherently neutral offsetting outcomes as conservation gains, a tactic that breeds false complacency and results in reduced incentive for additional conservation efforts, and the clearing of native vegetation for commercial plantations in the name of compensatory afforestation, a practice that leads to biodiversity decline. The risks accompanying cost shifting and other perverse incentives, if not preempted and addressed, will result in net loss of forest cover in India. We recommend accurate baselines, transparent accounting, and open reporting of offset outcomes to ensure biodiversity offsetting achieves adequate and additional compensation for impacts of development.
Keywords:additionality  compensatory afforestation  Green India Mission  mitigation hierarchy  no net loss  offset funds  UNFCCC  UNCBD  adicionalidad  fondos de compensació  n  Green India Mission  jerarquí  a de mitigació  n  repoblació  n forestal compensatoria  sin pé  rdida neta  UNFCCC  UNCBD                             绿                                                                                                                          
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号