首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

原子荧光法和电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定水中锑的比较
引用本文:张晓赟,顾晓明,周民锋,秦宏兵.原子荧光法和电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定水中锑的比较[J].环境监控与预警,2016,8(6):26-28.
作者姓名:张晓赟  顾晓明  周民锋  秦宏兵
作者单位:苏州市环境监测中心,江苏 苏州,215000
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项资助项目(2012ZX07506—003)
摘    要:分别用原子荧光法(AFS)和电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)测定水中锑。AFS法和ICP-MS法均线性良好,相关系数分别为0.999 8和0.999 9,检出限分别为0.17和0.03μg/L,相对标准偏差均1.15%,加标回收率分别为96.6%~111.9%和95.4%~111.5%,2种方法均能很好地用于水中锑的测定。其中,ICP-MS法适合较清洁地表水和地下水样品中锑的分析,AFS法则对地表水、地下水和废水样品均适用。

关 键 词:原子荧光法  电感耦合等离子体质谱法    
收稿时间:2016/5/25 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/6/27 0:00:00

Comparison between AFS and ICP MS in the Determination of Antimony in Water
ZHANG Xiao yun,GU Xiao ming,ZHOU Min feng,QIN Hong bing.Comparison between AFS and ICP MS in the Determination of Antimony in Water[J].Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning,2016,8(6):26-28.
Authors:ZHANG Xiao yun  GU Xiao ming  ZHOU Min feng  QIN Hong bing
Abstract:Antimony in water was determined by AFS and ICP-MS methods.The linearity was good for antimony determined both by AFS and ICP-MS,with correlation coefficients 0.999 8 and 0.999 9, respectively.The limits of detection were 0.17 and 0.03μg/L, respectively.The RSDs of both methods were less than 1.15%, The recoveries were in the range of 96.6 %~111.9%, and 95.4%~111.5%for AFS and ICP-MS, respectively.Both of the two methods can be used to determine antimony in water samples effectively .ICP-MS was better for the determination of antimony in cleaner surface water and groundwater , while AFS was more suit-able for surface water , groundwater and waste water .
Keywords:AFS  ICP-MS  Antimony  Water
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境监控与预警》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境监控与预警》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号