首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Reforming EIA systems: A critical review of proposals in Brazil
Institution:1. Federal University of Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil;2. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;3. Escola Superior Dom Helder Câmara, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil;1. Dipartimento di Agraria, Sezione Ingegneria del Territorio, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Viale Italia, 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy;2. UCL QASER Lab & Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 7HB, UK;1. Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, 303-70 Dysart Road, Winnipeg R3T 2M6, Canada;2. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, The King''s University College, 9125-50 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2H3, Canada;1. Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L''Aquila, L''Aquila, Italy;2. Department of Architecture, University ‘G. D''Annunzio’ Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy;1. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, South Africa;2. Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University, South Africa;3. School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom;4. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom;1. Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy;2. GB Studio consultancy, Via della Colla 3, 18100 Andora, SV, Italy
Abstract:Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) systems are under pressure in many countries, driven by a call for efficiency and streamlining. Such a phenomenon is particularly clear in Brazil, where, in the past few years, a number of influential associations put forward documents proposing significant changes to environmental licensing and impact assessment regulations. So far, there is no publicly available information about any initiative towards scrutinizing those proposals. The objective of this study was to critically review the merits and drawbacks of the changes proposed in those documents. The analysis triangulated content analysis, focus group and online survey data. The focus group included ten seasoned Brazilian EIA specialists; the survey, based on Likert-scale and open-ended questions, resulted in 322 valid responses from EIA professionals. Results show that the proposals generally agree that the current EIA system, while playing a key role in mitigating impacts and enhancing project design, needs many changes. Nonetheless, the proposals neither offered solutions to overcome political, technical and budget barriers, nor established a sense of priority of the most urgent issues. Findings from the focus group and the survey signaled that a number of proposed actions might face public outcry, and that those changes that do not depend on legislative action are more likely to be implementable. Previous studies about EIA reform focused mostly on the context of developed countries after changes had taken place. This study, while addressing the perspective of a large developing country in a “before-reform” stage, shows that capacity-building is a key requirement in EIA reform.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号