首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


EMAP Design and River Reach File 3 (RF3) as a Sample Frame in the Central Valley, California
Authors:Robert K Hall  Anthony Olsen  Donald Stevens  Barbara Rosenbaum  Peter Husby  Gary A Wolinsky  Daniel T Heggem
Institution:(1) USEPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105, USA;(2) USEPA NHEERL-WED, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA;(3) Dynamac Corp., 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA;(4) OAO Corp., 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA;(5) USEPA Region IX Laboratory, 1337 S. 46th St.; Bldg. 201, Richmond, CA 94804, USA;(6) USEPA Environmental Science Division, Landscape Ecology Branch, Las Vegas, NV 89193, USA
Abstract:The Central Valley, California, R-EMAP project assessed the effects of highly modified, agriculturally dominated landuse on the aquatic resources of the lower portion of the Central Valley watersheds. The focus of this paper is to assess the utility of the EMAP design and the River Reach File version 3 (RF3) 1:100,000 scale Digital Line Graph (DLG) as a sampling frame. The study area is 34,099 mi2(88,316 km2) and comprises the lower reaches of the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River watersheds to the 1000 ft. (305 m) elevation. Sampling sites are selected using a tessellation stratified design to represent the two main populations of interest: natural streams and man-made waterways. Sites are selected to represent 13,226 miles of streams and sloughs, and 14,648 miles of irrigation canals, ditches and drains. To achieve an approximately equal sample size across stream orders and basins, the sample design was weighted by Strahler order categories to ensure sampling occurred in the higher order streams. Based on office and field reconnaissance, the study provided information on the quality of RF3 as a sampling frame. Site selection using RF3 had a success rate of approximately 44%. The RF3 database has an error rate of approximately 7%. When human influence factors were included, the error rate increased to 16%. There was an 11% error rate when selecting sites for natural streams, and approximately a 14% error rate for man-made waterways. The reconnaissance information indicated that presence or absence of irrigation ditches and return drains depends on changing agricultural uses. Some of the error in the RF3 for natural streams and man-made waterways can be attributed to rapid urban expansion, especially in the San Joaquin basin.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号