首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparison of methods of preserving tissues for pesticide analysis
Authors:William H Stickel  Lucille F Stickel  Russell A Dyrland  Donald L Hughes
Institution:(1) Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 20708 Laurel, MD, USA;(2) Hazleton-Raltech. Inc., 53707 Madison, WI, USA
Abstract:Formalin preservation, freezing, spoiling followed by freezing, and phenoxyethanol were compared in terms of concentrations of DDT, DDD, DDE, endrin, and heptachlor epoxide measured in brain, liver and carcass of birds fed dietary dosages of pesticides and in spiked egg homogenate. Phenoxyethanol proved to be an unsatisfactory preservative; the amount of lsquoextractable lipidrsquo was excessive, and measurements of concentrations in replicates were erratic. Concentrations of residues in formalin-preserved and frozen samples did not differ significantly in any tissue. Percentage lipid in brains and eggs, however, were significantly lower in formalin-preserved samples. Samples of muscle and liver that had been spoiled before freezing yielded less DDD, and muscle samples yielded more DDT than formalin-preserved samples. We conclude that formalin preservation is a satisfactory method for preservation of field samples and that the warming and spoiling of samples that may occur unavoidably in the field will not result in misleading analytical results.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号