| 不同水质评价方法在丹江口流域水质评价中应用比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张亚丽,周扬,程真,姚志鹏,申剑,王潇磊.不同水质评价方法在丹江口流域水质评价中应用比较[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(3):58-61. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张亚丽 周扬 程真 姚志鹏 申剑 王潇磊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南农业大学资源与环境学院 河南省高校农业资源利用工程技术研究中心, 河南 郑州 450002,河南农业大学资源与环境学院 河南省高校农业资源利用工程技术研究中心, 河南 郑州 450002,河南农业大学资源与环境学院 河南省高校农业资源利用工程技术研究中心, 河南 郑州 450002,中国环境监测总站 国家环境保护环境监测质量控制重点实验室, 北京 100012,河南省环境监测中心, 河南 郑州 450004,河南省环境监测中心, 河南 郑州 450004 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAC12B01-01,2011BAC12B02-01);河南省重点科技攻关计划(142102310098) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 采用合理的水质评价方法,准确地描述河流水质状况,才能为水质管理提供治理方案。以丹江口水源地为例,选用单因子指数评价方法、综合污染指数评价方法、模糊综合评判法、主成分分析法、水污染指数法对丹江口水源地7个河流断面进行水质评价并对比评价效果。结果表明,水污染指数法操作简便、评价结果直观明了,具有广泛的应用范围。
|
| 关 键 词： | 水质评价 评价方法 分析 |
| 收稿时间： | 6/6/2014 12:00:00 AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2014/10/28 0:00:00 |
Comparison and Analysis of Different Evaluation Methods for Water Quality in the Danjiangkou Valley |
| |
| ZHANG Ya-li,ZHOU Yang,CHENG Zhen,YAO Zhi-peng,SHEN Jian and WANG Xiao-lei.Comparison and Analysis of Different Evaluation Methods for Water Quality in the Danjiangkou Valley[J].Environmental Monitoring in China,2015,31(3):58-61. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Ya-li ZHOU Yang CHENG Zhen YAO Zhi-peng SHEN Jian and WANG Xiao-lei |
| |
| Institution: | College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agriculture University, Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Resources, Zhengzhou 450002, China,College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agriculture University, Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Resources, Zhengzhou 450002, China,College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agriculture University, Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Resources, Zhengzhou 450002, China,State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Quality Control in Environmental Monitoring, China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, Beijing 100012, China,Henan Province Environmental Monitoring Centre, Zhengzhou 450004, China and Henan Province Environmental Monitoring Centre, Zhengzhou 450004, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Only reasonable water quality method utilized can the river water quality situation be relatively clearly described, and further provides pollution control solutions for water managers. Five normal appraisal methods were chosen in the research, single factor index appraisal method, comprehensive pollution index appraisal method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, principal component analysis method, and water pollution index method, which were used in the example of calculation of the seven monitoring sections in Danjiangkou water sources and then compared and analyzed the evaluation results of water quality. Results showed that the water pollution index method is a simple method of intuitive evaluation results with a wide range of applications. |
| |
| Keywords: | water quality evaluation appraisal method analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国环境监测》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国环境监测》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
