首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

地下水采样方法比对研究
引用本文:李文攀,朱擎,嵇晓燕,刘廷良,孙宗光.地下水采样方法比对研究[J].中国环境监测,2016,32(4):104-108.
作者姓名:李文攀  朱擎  嵇晓燕  刘廷良  孙宗光
作者单位:中国环境监测总站, 国家环境保护环境监测质量控制重点实验室, 北京 100012,中国环境监测总站, 国家环境保护环境监测质量控制重点实验室, 北京 100012,中国环境监测总站, 国家环境保护环境监测质量控制重点实验室, 北京 100012,中国环境监测总站, 国家环境保护环境监测质量控制重点实验室, 北京 100012,中国环境监测总站, 国家环境保护环境监测质量控制重点实验室, 北京 100012
基金项目:全国地下水基础环境状况调查评估项目(14413045)
摘    要:选取3种地下水采样方法开展方法比对研究。通过系统分析监测数据,指出了3种方法所采水样在基本水质参数、无机离子、金属、挥发性有机物以及感官类指标等项目监测上的显著差异,指出了各种方法的适用性并分析原因。结果表明:与贝勒管法、潜水泵法相比,低流速法有效地解决了采样操作过程中易产生的曝气问题;对井内水体扰动较小,降低了水样浊度;减小了井内水位的大幅度泄降,避免了不同层位间污染物的迁移及周边水和井内滞水的交叉污染;节约了场地操作时间和后期污水处理所需花费。因此,低流速法在采取代表性水质样品方面更具方法优势。

关 键 词:地下水采样  低流速法  曝气  浊度  代表性
收稿时间:2015/8/27 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/1/8 0:00:00

Comparative Study of Sampling Methods in Ground Water
LI Wenpan,ZHU Qing,JI Xiaoyan,LIU Tingliang and SUN Zongguang.Comparative Study of Sampling Methods in Ground Water[J].Environmental Monitoring in China,2016,32(4):104-108.
Authors:LI Wenpan  ZHU Qing  JI Xiaoyan  LIU Tingliang and SUN Zongguang
Institution:The State Key Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring Quality Control, China Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012, China,The State Key Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring Quality Control, China Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012, China,The State Key Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring Quality Control, China Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012, China,The State Key Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring Quality Control, China Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012, China and The State Key Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring Quality Control, China Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012, China
Abstract:In this paper, three kinds of groundwater sampling are comparatively analyzed. Through systematically analyzes of the monitoring data, the significant differences in basic parameters, ions, metals, VOCs and, Sensory indexes of water sampling from the three methods are presented, and proposed the applicability of different methods. The results indicate that, the low-flow sampling,as compared to traditional methods, can effectively solve aeration in the sampling process, reduce the sample turbidity with small disturbance, minimize drawdown of the water table,avoid cross contamination resulting from mixing of different formation water with stagnant water in the well, save field time and eliminate sewage treatment costs associated with well purging and sampling. The Low-Flow sampling method is more advantage in taking representative samples.
Keywords:groundwater sampling  low-flow sampling  aeration  turbidity  representative
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国环境监测》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境监测》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号