| PSAT和BPA在电力系统潮流计算中的对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谷玉宝,宋墩文,李月乔,杨学涛,高崇.PSAT和BPA在电力系统潮流计算中的对比研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2015(6):1-5. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谷玉宝 宋墩文 李月乔 杨学涛 高崇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华北电力大学电气与电子工程学院, 北京 102206;中国电力科学研究院, 北京 100192;广东电网公司电网规划研究中心, 广州 510080 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对当前电力系统分析程序存在差异的问题,从潮流计算角度,对比研究了国内目前使用较为普遍的2款潮流计算程序(PSAT和PSD-BPA),分析了收敛误差、发电机分接头、负荷比例等不同初值条件设置对其潮流计算结果的影响。分析结果表明:PSAT在建模、可视化和自定义方面具有一定优势,比较适合小规模电网仿真和自定义元件模型研究;而BPA的计算速度快,计算精度高,比较适合大规模电网仿真。
|
| 关 键 词： | PSAT BPA 潮流计算 |
Comparison between PSAT and BPA in power system power flow calculation |
| |
| Gu Yubao,Song Dunwen,Li Yueqiao,Yang Xuetao,Gao Chong.Comparison between PSAT and BPA in power system power flow calculation[J].Journal of Disaster Prevent and Mitigation Eng,2015(6):1-5. |
| |
| Authors: | Gu Yubao Song Dunwen Li Yueqiao Yang Xuetao Gao Chong |
| |
| Institution: | School of Electric and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206 , China;China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192 , China; Power Grid Planning Center of Guangdong Power Grid Company , Guangzhou 5 10080, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Aiming at the problem of the current power system analysis program existing differences ,from the point of view of power flow calculation, contrasts and studies the two commonly usedsoftware programs(PSAT & BPA )in china, analyzes different initial conditions, such as convergence error, the generator tap settings and load ratio, have different influence on the resultbf power flow. The analysis result shows that PSAT has certain advantage in modeling visualizationand user -defined, is suitable for small -scale power system simulation and user -defined modelresearch; But BPA has fast calculation speed and high calculation accuracy, is suitable for large-scale power system simulation. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《防灾减灾工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《防灾减灾工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
