首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


EU risk assessment guidelines
Authors:Volker Berding  Stefan Schwartz  Michael Matthies
Institution:(1) Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrück, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany
Abstract:Regional PECs (Potential Environmental Concentrations) calculated with the software EUSES were compared with measured values using different emission and environmental distribution scenarios. The environmental data set recommended in EUSES (default data set) represents a generic standard region. In different scenarios the parameters of the generic region are replaced by concrete values, and estimated parameters (emissions, degradation rates and partition coefficients) are substituted by measured or investigated values. Deviations with regard to the measured values can be up to three orders of magnitude. Despite the basically conservative approximations, underestimations can occur. However, these are usually due to poor monitoring data or inappropriate input values. The use of regional data instead of default parameters only slightly ameliorates the results. The use of real emission and degradation rates alone can improve the results significantly.
Keywords:EUSES  Level III multimedia model  Simple Box  measured concentrations  comparison with modelled results  predicted environmental concentrations  water  air  soil  sediment  scenario analysis  generic data  regional data  scenarios  genericregion  default data  regional data  North Rhine-Westphalia  substances  Benzene  DEHP  EDC  EDTA  PCDD  HHCB  LAS  EDTA  validation  measured concentrations  modelled results
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号