首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: more than before, but less than needed
Authors:Rosina Bierbaum  Joel B Smith  Arthur Lee  Maria Blair  Lynne Carter  F Stuart Chapin III  Paul Fleming  Susan Ruffo  Missy Stults  Shannon McNeeley  Emily Wasley  Laura Verduzco
Institution:1. School of Natural Resources and Environment, and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
2. Stratus Consulting, Boulder, CO, USA
3. Chevron Services Company, San Ramon, CA, USA
4. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
5. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
6. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA
7. Seattle Public Utilities, Seattle, WA, USA
8. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA
9. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
10. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
11. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C., WA, USA
12. Chevron Energy Technology Company, San Ramon, CA, USA
Abstract:We reviewed existing and planned adaptation activities of federal, tribal, state, and local governments and the private sector in the United States (U.S.) to understand what types of adaptation activities are underway across different sectors and scales throughout the country. Primary sources of review included material officially submitted for consideration in the upcoming 2013 U.S. National Climate Assessment and supplemental peer-reviewed and grey literature. Although substantial adaptation planning is occurring in various sectors, levels of government, and the private sector, few measures have been implemented and even fewer have been evaluated. Most adaptation actions to date appear to be incremental changes, not the transformational changes that may be needed in certain cases to adapt to significant changes in climate. While there appear to be no one-size-fits-all adaptations, there are similarities in approaches across scales and sectors, including mainstreaming climate considerations into existing policies and plans, and pursuing no- and low-regrets strategies. Despite the positive momentum in recent years, barriers to implementation still impede action in all sectors and across scales. The most significant barriers include lack of funding, policy and institutional constraints, and difficulty in anticipating climate change given the current state of information on change. However, the practice of adaptation can advance through learning by doing, stakeholder engagements (including “listening sessions”), and sharing of best practices. Efforts to advance adaptation across the U.S. and globally will necessitate the reduction or elimination of barriers, the enhancement of information and best practice sharing mechanisms, and the creation of comprehensive adaptation evaluation metrics.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号