首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

水泥窑协同处置工业废弃物的生命周期评价
引用本文:侯星宇,张芸,戚昱,蒋慧,张琳,曲殿利.水泥窑协同处置工业废弃物的生命周期评价[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(12):4112-4119.
作者姓名:侯星宇  张芸  戚昱  蒋慧  张琳  曲殿利
作者单位:工业生态与环境工程教育部重点实验室, 大连理工大学环境学院, 大连 116024,工业生态与环境工程教育部重点实验室, 大连理工大学环境学院, 大连 116024,工业生态与环境工程教育部重点实验室, 大连理工大学环境学院, 大连 116024,工业生态与环境工程教育部重点实验室, 大连理工大学环境学院, 大连 116024,旅顺口区环境保护局, 大连 116041,辽宁科技大学高温材料与镁资源工程学院, 鞍山 114051
基金项目:辽宁省科学事业公益研究基金(No.2014003021);国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(No.2012ZX07202-001)
摘    要:以废白土、废催化剂和污染土壤等工业废弃物为研究对象,运用生命周期评价(LCA)方法,对水泥窑协同处置废弃物的环境影响进行评价.通过建立生产过程输入、输出清单,从全球变暖潜值、资源消耗潜值、人体毒性潜值等方面,基于Gabi5.0软件进行建模与计算,对水泥窑常规生产工艺与协同处置工业废弃物工艺产生的环境影响进行比较.结果表明:功能单位(1 t)水泥的生产过程中,常规生产工艺和协同处置工艺的环境影响潜值分别为5.78×10~(-11)和5.61×10~(-11),协同处置工艺使得全生命周期环境影响潜值降低了2.94%;水泥生产过程最主要的环境影响是全球变暖和人体毒性,其中,协同处置工艺下这两种环境影响分别降低了0.80%和1.80%,资源消耗相比常规生产降低了11.1%;从全生命周期看,水泥生产中熟料煅烧阶段对环境的影响最大,协同处置工艺下熟料煅烧阶段的环境影响相比常规生产降低了8.0%.协同处置工艺相比常规生产工艺有更好的环境效益.

关 键 词:水泥窑协同处置  工业废弃物  生命周期评价  环境影响
收稿时间:2015/1/28 0:00:00
修稿时间:4/8/2015 12:00:00 AM

Life cycle assessment of co-processing industrial waste in a cement kiln
HOU Xingyu,ZHANG Yun,QI Yu,JIANG Hui,ZHANG Lin and QU Dianli.Life cycle assessment of co-processing industrial waste in a cement kiln[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2015,35(12):4112-4119.
Authors:HOU Xingyu  ZHANG Yun  QI Yu  JIANG Hui  ZHANG Lin and QU Dianli
Institution:Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering(MOE), School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024,Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering(MOE), School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024,Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering(MOE), School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024,Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering(MOE), School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024,Environmental Protection Agency of Lushun District, Dalian 116041 and School of High Temperature Materials and Magnesite Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051
Abstract:The environmental impact of co-processing with waste clay, spent catalysts, contaminated soil and other industrial waste in cement kilns were assessed by using life cycle assessment (LCA). A life cycle inventory including input and output processes of cement production was established based on inventory analysis. Gabi5.0 software was used to model and calculate the original data to obtain the corresponding environmental impact potentials, and comparisons were made between conventional and co-processing cement processes on global warming potential, resource depletion potential and human toxicity potential. The results showed that the environmental impact values of conventional and co-processing cement processes for per functional unit of cement production were 5.78×10-11 and 5.61×10-11 respectively. Compared with conventional production process, the lifecycle environmental impact potential of co-processing was reduced by a factor of 2.94%; global warming potential and human toxicity potential made the greatest contribution to environmental impacts in cement production, with decreased environmental impact potentials of co-processing by 0.80% and 1.80% respectively and the decreased environmental impact potential of co-processing on resource depletion by 11.1%; from the view of a whole lifecycle of cement production, clinker calcination ranked the first in environmental impacts, with a reduced rate of co-processing of 8.0% in comparison with the conventional production process. Co-processing has a better environmental performance than conventional production.
Keywords:co-processing in cement kilns  industrial waste  life cycle assessment (LCA)  environmental impact
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号