首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

京津冀重霾期间PM_(2.5)来源数值模拟研究
引用本文:黄蕊珠,陈焕盛,葛宝珠,姚石泉,王哲,杨文夷,陈学舜,朱莉莉,黄思,王自发.京津冀重霾期间PM_(2.5)来源数值模拟研究[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(9):2670-2680.
作者姓名:黄蕊珠  陈焕盛  葛宝珠  姚石泉  王哲  杨文夷  陈学舜  朱莉莉  黄思  王自发
作者单位:1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029;2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049,中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029,中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029,中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029,中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029,1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029;2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049,1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029;2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049,中国环境监测总站, 北京 100012,1. 中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029;2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049,中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029
基金项目:中国科学院战略性先导项目(No.XDB05030203,XDB05030101);国家自然科学基金(No.41405119,41305113);环保公益性行业科研专项(No.201509014);国家科技支撑计划项目(No.2014BAC22B04)
摘    要:厘清PM2.5的来源是开展重霾污染防治的前提条件.本研究利用嵌套网格空气质量预报模式系统(NAQPMS)及其耦合的污染来源追踪技术,针对2013年1月我国中东部的重霾污染过程,定量模拟分析京津冀各城市PM2.5浓度的来源和相互贡献.研究结果表明,NAQPMS模式能够合理反映京津冀不同城市PM2.5浓度的变化特征.京津冀各城市近地面PM2.5浓度主要受本地排放影响,本地贡献率介于29.8%~63.7%.而800 m高空层各城市PM2.5浓度以外来贡献为主(69.3%~86.3%).在污染最严重的东南部地区(包括邢台、邯郸、沧州和衡水),PM2.5浓度受区域外的山东和河南的显著影响,贡献率可达25.2%~31.5%.因此,在京津冀区域内进行协同减排控制的同时,需进一步将山东、河南等省份纳入联防联控范围,才能有效防控重霾污染.

关 键 词:NAQPMS  灰霾  污染来源追踪  京津冀
收稿时间:2014/10/25 0:00:00
修稿时间:2015/1/16 0:00:00

Numerical study on source contributions to PM2.5 over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area during a severe haze event
HUANG Ruizhu,CHEN Huansheng,GE Baozhu,YAO Shiquan,WANG Zhe,YANG Wenyi,CHEN Xueshun,ZHU Lili,HUANG Si and WANG Zifa.Numerical study on source contributions to PM2.5 over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area during a severe haze event[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2015,35(9):2670-2680.
Authors:HUANG Ruizhu  CHEN Huansheng  GE Baozhu  YAO Shiquan  WANG Zhe  YANG Wenyi  CHEN Xueshun  ZHU Lili  HUANG Si and WANG Zifa
Institution:1. State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029,State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029,State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029,State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029,1. State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,1. State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,China National Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012,1. State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 and State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029
Abstract:Identification of the source regions of PM2.5 and quantification of theircontributions are critical for efficient haze pollution control. In this study, the Nested Air Quality Prediction Model System (NAQPMS) coupled with an online source-tagging module was employed to simulate an extreme severe haze episode over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) area in January 2013. A detailed quantification of the source contributions from different regions was provided. The simulation was validated through comparisonwith surface observations, which suggested that the model could reasonably reproduce the temporal and spatial variations of PM2.5 concentrations during this episode. The results of the source-tagging calculation suggested that local emissions were the dominated sources of the surface PM2.5, accounting for 29.8% to 63.7% contributions of the surface PM2.5 concentrations. On the other hand, PM2.5 at 800 m layer was mainly contributed by the sources of the surrounding areas with the contributed ratio from 69.3% to 86.3%. For the most polluted southeast BTH area (including Xingtai, Handan, Cangzhou and Hengshui), emissions from Shandong and Henan provinces had significant contribution to the PM2.5 pollution with the largest contributions 25.2% and 31.5% at surface and 800 m layer, respectively. Therefore, the control of haze pollution over BHT areas should not only focus on the collaborative emission control within BHT areas but also take into account the joint emission control for BHT regions, Shandong and Henan Provinces.
Keywords:NAQPMS  haze  source tagged  Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号