首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同水分管理模式对水稻吸收土壤砷的影响
引用本文:龙水波,曾敏,周航,廖柏寒,钟倩云,雷鸣.不同水分管理模式对水稻吸收土壤砷的影响[J].环境科学学报,2014,34(4):1003-1008.
作者姓名:龙水波  曾敏  周航  廖柏寒  钟倩云  雷鸣
作者单位:中南林业科技大学林学院, 长沙 410004;中南林业科技大学林学院, 长沙 410004;中南林业科技大学林学院, 长沙 410004;中南林业科技大学林学院, 长沙 410004;中南林业科技大学林学院, 长沙 410004;中南林业科技大学林学院, 长沙 410004
基金项目:环保公益性行业科研专项(No.201009047);国家自然科学青年基金项目(No.41201530);湖南省自然科学基金(No.12JJ5007);湖南省重点学科建设项目
摘    要:通过水稻盆栽试验,研究了淹水灌溉(F)、灌浆期前湿润灌溉(A-F)、灌浆期后湿润灌溉(F-A)、淹水与湿润交替(AFA)这4种水分管理模式对水稻吸收土壤As的影响.结果表明,同F处理比较,A-F处理能显著降低水稻根和茎叶As含量,F-A和AFA处理都能显著降低水稻茎叶、谷壳、糙米As含量和糙米无机As含量.A-F、F-A、AFA处理对水稻生物量影响都不大,仅AFA处理减少了水稻根系生物量.F-A和AFA处理降低糙米As含量的机理是:灌浆期是水稻糙米吸收土壤As的关键时期,此时的湿润灌溉提高了土壤E h,土壤溶液As(Ⅲ)与As(Ⅴ)浓度之和、As(Ⅲ)/As(Ⅴ)的比例都显著降低,从而使土壤As的迁移能力得到抑制.F-A处理降低水稻糙米总As和无机As含量的效果与AFA处理无显著差异,但F-A处理的操作更简单,因此,F-A处理应当是污染土壤中控制水稻糙米累积As的最佳水分管理模式.

关 键 词:水分管理模式  水稻  土壤  砷污染
收稿时间:9/8/2013 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:2013/9/27 0:00:00

Effects of different water management modes on soil arsenic uptake by rice plants
LONG Shuibo,ZENG Min,ZHOU Hang,LIAO Bohan,ZHONG Qianyun and LEI Ming.Effects of different water management modes on soil arsenic uptake by rice plants[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2014,34(4):1003-1008.
Authors:LONG Shuibo  ZENG Min  ZHOU Hang  LIAO Bohan  ZHONG Qianyun and LEI Ming
Institution:Forestry College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004;Forestry College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004;Forestry College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004;Forestry College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004;Forestry College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004;Forestry College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004
Abstract:A pot experiment was conducted to study the effects of four modes of water managements on soil arsenic (As) uptake by rice plants. These four modes were flooding throughout the entire period of rice growth (F), aerobic flooding before flowering stage (A-F), aerobic flooding after flowering stage (F-A), and alternate flooding and aerobic during flowering stage (AFA). The results showed that, compared to F, A-F reduced As contents in rice roots and straws significantly, while F-A and AFA reduced As contents in the straws, husks and grains of rice plants, and also reduced inorganic As in grains significantly. A-F, F-A and AFA showed little effects on rices biomass, but AFA resulted in decreases in the biomass of rice roots. The mechanisms of F-A and AFA reducing As contents in rice grains were supposed. Aerobic flooding during flowering stage, a key period of soil As uptake by rice plants, enhanced soil Eh values, which resulted in significantly decrease in the sum of As3+ and As5+ contents and the ratio of As3+/As5+, hence restrained transfer of soil As to rice plants. There were no obvious differences between F-A and AFA in reducing contents of total As and inorganic As in rice grains; however, F-A was an easier mode to apply than AFA in rice planting, indicating that F-A was more promising in water managements to reduce As uptake by rice plants in As contaminated soils.
Keywords:water management modes  rice  soil  arsenic contamination
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号