首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

化工企业突发大气环境风险评价标准的探讨
引用本文:陈郁,杨凤林,宋国宝,刘振宇,徐小宁.化工企业突发大气环境风险评价标准的探讨[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(9):2310-2318.
作者姓名:陈郁  杨凤林  宋国宝  刘振宇  徐小宁
作者单位:工业生态与环境工程教育部重点实验室 大连理工大学环境学院,大连,116024
基金项目:国家自然科学青年基金(No.41001354)
摘    要:为了有效评价突发性化工环境污染事件的环境影响程度,急需建立科学有效的环境风险评价体系,而科学合理的风险评价标准体系是进行准确环境风险评价的前提和基础.本研究在对国内外风险评价标准体系研究分析的基础上,指出国内现有风险标准体系的LC50和IDLH阈值用于短期急性接触空气浓度标准值不尽合理.通过对比分析AEGLs、ERPGs、TEELs、AETLs等国际上通用标准值的出台背景、意义及适用条件,建议我国在化工行业突发性环境污染事件的环境风险评价过程中,优先选用AEGLs作为评价标准,其次选用ERPGs和TEELs,并以LC50及IDLH作适当补充.文中以某化工园区为例进行了比较研究,结果表明,与现行的LC50和IDLH相比,AEGLs、ERPGs、TEELs作为标准值能更有效反映有毒化学品突发泄漏对人体健康的影响程度,可作为化工行业突发环境风险事件的评价标准.

关 键 词:化工行业  环境风险  评价标准
收稿时间:2011/11/15 0:00:00
修稿时间:2011/12/15 0:00:00

Study on the inhalation standard of accidental environmental risk assessment in the chemical industry
CHEN Yu,YANG Fenglin,SONG Guobao,LIU Zhenyu and XU Xiaoning.Study on the inhalation standard of accidental environmental risk assessment in the chemical industry[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2012,32(9):2310-2318.
Authors:CHEN Yu  YANG Fenglin  SONG Guobao  LIU Zhenyu and XU Xiaoning
Institution:Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024;Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024;Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024;Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024;Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024
Abstract:In order to assess the environmental risk for accidental emissions from the chemical industry effectively, it is necessary to establish a reasonable criteria system for risk assessment. Currently IDLH and LC50 thresholds criteria are used for assessing chemical accident in China. Compared with the criteria abroad, such as AEGLs, ERPGs, TEELs and AETLs, the existing criteria of IDLH and LC50 thresholds are not very rational. It is suggested that the standard can be prioritized as follows, 1)AEGLs; 2)ERPGs; 3)TEELs; and 4)LC50 and IDLH. A case study is carried out to compare the effects of these criteria. The result shows that AEGLs, ERPGs and TEELs are more reasonable than that of the existing criteria used in China to evaluate the impact of accidental events.
Keywords:chemical industry  environmental risk  assessment criteria
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号