首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

土工离心机风阻计算方法的对比研究
引用本文:郝雨,尹益辉,万强,黎启胜.土工离心机风阻计算方法的对比研究[J].装备环境工程,2018,15(3):61-66.
作者姓名:郝雨  尹益辉  万强  黎启胜
作者单位:中国工程物理研究院 总体工程研究所,四川 绵阳 621999,中国工程物理研究院 总体工程研究所,四川 绵阳 621999,中国工程物理研究院 总体工程研究所,四川 绵阳 621999,中国工程物理研究院 总体工程研究所,四川 绵阳 621999
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(No. 11702279);中国工程物理研究院总体工程研究所统筹项目(No. TCGH041607)
摘    要:目的评估不同土工离心机风阻功率估算方法的效果和优缺点,为工程应用及未来研究发展方向提出建议。方法重点以土工离心机为例,总结几种有代表性的计算方法,系统分析不同方法之间的共性和差异。通过一个算例,同时结合以往离心机的设计经验,对各种方法的效果进行对比。结果法国方法、美国方法、中国工程物理研究院方法和CFD仿真方法在精度上依次增大,但复杂性依次升高,后两种方法不需借助试验来确定参数。结论对于中低速土工离心机,中国工程物理研究院方法具有较大的优势。随着土工离心机向着高速、大规模方向发展,经典解析方法的适用性尚未得到充分验证,基于CFD的高置信度仿真是一种较好的解决方案。

关 键 词:土工离心机  风阻  流场  随流比
收稿时间:2017/9/24 0:00:00
修稿时间:2018/3/15 0:00:00

Comparative Study on Estimation Methods of Wind Resistance of Geotechnical Centrifuges
HAO Yu,YIN Yi-hui,WAN Qiang and LI Qi-sheng.Comparative Study on Estimation Methods of Wind Resistance of Geotechnical Centrifuges[J].Equipment Environmental Engineering,2018,15(3):61-66.
Authors:HAO Yu  YIN Yi-hui  WAN Qiang and LI Qi-sheng
Institution:Institute of Engineering Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, China,Institute of Engineering Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, China,Institute of Engineering Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, China and Institute of Engineering Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate effects and pros-and-cons of different estimation methods for wind resistance of geotechnical centrifuges, and provide suggestions on engineering application and future research. Methods Geotechnical centrifuge was mainly taken as example to introduce several typical calculation methods and systematically analyze commonness and difference among the methods. The effects of different methods were compared by a classical example combined with design experience on centrifuges. Results French Methods, US Method, CAEP Method and CFD Simulation had a successively increasing accuracy with a successively increasing complexity. Meanwhile the later two did not depend on experimenting data in determination of parameters. Conclusion For geotechnical centrifuges working at low-to medium speeds, the CAEP method has an advantage over others in engineering practice. But as the development of geotechnical centrifuges to the direction of large scales and high speeds, the validity of traditional analytical methods is still not examined. High fidelity methods based on CFD seems a good option.
Keywords:geotechnical centrifuge  wind resistance  flow field  air following flow ratio
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《装备环境工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《装备环境工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号