首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Scientific evidence,expert entrepreneurship,and ecosystem narratives in the UK Natural Environment White Paper
Institution:1. Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom;2. Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA;1. Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Forest Protection and Entomology, Kamycka 1176, CZ-165 21 Prague, Czech Republic;2. Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Branisovska 31, CZ-370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic;3. University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Education, Department of Biology, Geosciences and Environmental Education, Klatovska 51, CZ-306 19 Plzen, Czech Republic;4. Muzeum and Gallery of Orlicke Mts., Jiraskova 2, CZ-516 01 Rychnov nad Kneznou, Czech Republic;5. University of Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Rokitanskeho 62, CZ-500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic;1. ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia;2. National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia;3. University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands;4. National Technical University of Athens, Greece;5. CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland;6. Brookhaven National Lab, U.S.A.;7. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore;1. Department of Nuclear Physics and High Energies, Rio de Janeiro State University, 20550-900 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;2. LIAAD/ INESC TEC, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal;3. Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, 4200-464 Porto, Portugal;1. Computer Science Laboratory, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau 91120, France;2. Department of Informatics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens 10434, Greece;3. Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract:The Natural Environment White Paper represents the most important conservation policy shift in the United Kingdom (UK) in twenty years. It formalises the ecosystem approach within national policy objectives and emphasises the economic value of ecosystem services. By analysing the use of various evidence sources, the involvement of science entrepreneurs, and the development of policy narratives, our goal was to understand factors that influenced adoption of an ecosystem service framework in the UK. We interviewed 48 policy actors and found that centrally-sponsored synthesis reports with entrepreneurial authors provided the most influential expert-based knowledge in the development of the White Paper. More recently published reports had greater influence, yet the window of opportunity for scientific evidence having policy impact was greater in the problem-setting stages of policy development. The interaction between teams preparing syntheses and expert entrepreneurs helped influence the construction of strategic policy narratives. Those narratives increased the impact of scientific evidence by communicating and framing key policy-salient messages, and brokering between broad ecosystem-based and environmental economics narratives. The combination of ecological and economics evidence was particularly salient in the UK case due to the context of continued biodiversity loss and the acceptability of valuation narratives within central government. Our findings suggest that evidence impact varies at different stages of the policy process, and that this is driven by the interplay of contextual factors like policy timing, personal influence, and the competition between different sets of actors and narratives.
Keywords:Narrative policy framework  Research impact  Expert entrepreneurs  Ecosystem services  Environmental valuation  Knowledge brokerage
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号