首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于铁锰泥的除砷吸附剂性能比较及吸附机理
引用本文:曾辉平,尹灿,李冬,吕赛赛,赵运新,张杰.基于铁锰泥的除砷吸附剂性能比较及吸附机理[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(9):3373-3379.
作者姓名:曾辉平  尹灿  李冬  吕赛赛  赵运新  张杰
作者单位:1. 北京工业大学, 水质科学与水环境恢复工程北京市重点试验室, 北京 100124; 2. 哈尔滨工业大学, 城市水资源与水环境国家重点试验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150090
基金项目:国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金资助项目(51308009)
摘    要:为解决反冲洗铁锰泥粉末吸附剂(BSPA)使用后难以泥水分离问题,将除铁锰水厂生物滤池产生的反冲洗泥制成颗粒吸附剂(GA)和磁性粉末吸附剂(MPA),并对BSPA、GA和MPA的除砷性能进行了比较,通过SEM、TED、XRD、BET、FTIR等技术对3种材料进行了表征,寻找3种吸附剂之间除砷性能差异的根源.结果表明,BSPA、GA和MPA对As (V)的最大吸附容量分别为40.980,5.048,8.694mg/g,改性后的吸附材料GA和MPA对砷的吸附能力下降.BSPA是一种以纤铁矿为主的无定形结构混合物,并混有针铁矿和结晶度差的水铁矿,GA的XRD图谱中出现石英晶体和少量赤铁矿晶体的衍射峰,而MPA的主要成分为结晶程度较高的磁赤铁矿.3种材料中均存在有利于吸附的含羟基官能团.BSPA、MPA和GA的比表面积分别为253.150,238.660,43.803m2/g.物相改变且结晶程度增加、表面羟基减少和比表面积降低是导致GA和MPA的砷吸附容量比BSPA低的主要因素.

关 键 词:反冲洗泥  颗粒吸附剂  磁性粉末吸附剂  除砷  吸附  
收稿时间:2018-02-10

Performance comparison and adsorption mechanism of arsenic removal adsorbents made of backwashing sludge from biofilter for iron and manganese removal
ZENG Hui-ping,YIN Can,LI Dong,LV Sai-sai,ZHAO Yun-xin,ZHANG Jie.Performance comparison and adsorption mechanism of arsenic removal adsorbents made of backwashing sludge from biofilter for iron and manganese removal[J].China Environmental Science,2018,38(9):3373-3379.
Authors:ZENG Hui-ping  YIN Can  LI Dong  LV Sai-sai  ZHAO Yun-xin  ZHANG Jie
Institution:1. Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China
Abstract:The backwashing residuals from iron and manganese removal biological filter of underground waters was made into granular adsorbent (GA) and magnetic powder adsorbent (MPA) to solve the problem that it is difficult to separate the exhausted backwashing sludge powder adsorbent (BSPA) and treated water. The arsenic removal capability of BSPA、GA and MPA were compared. And their structure and surface feature were compared by SEM, TED, XRD, BET and FTIR to find the cause of difference in arsenic removal capability among these three adsorbents. Results showed that the maximum As (V) adsorption capacity of BSPA, GA and MPA were 40.980, 5.048 and 8.694mg/g respectively. As it suggested, the As (V) adsorption capacity of GA and MPA decreased compared to BSPA. BSPA was a mixture with amorphous structure, lepidocrocite was the main ingredient, goethite and poor crystallized ferrihydrite also mixed in it. The XRD spectrum of GA appeared crystal diffraction peaks of quartz crystal and a small amount of hematite, while the main component of MPA was maghemite with high crystallinity. There are hydroxyl functional groups that are conducive to adsorption in all three materials. The specific surface areas of BSPA, MPA and GA were 253.150, 238.660 and 43.803m2/g respectively. Phase changes and increase of crystallinity, reduction of surface hydroxyl group and decrease of specific surface area may be the main factors lower the adsorption capacity of GA and MPA compared with BSPA.
Keywords:backwashing sludge powder adsorbent  granular adsorbent  magnetic powder adsorbent  arsenic removal  adsorption  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号