首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

抑制剂对淹水土壤反硝化和氨挥发的影响
引用本文:阿力木·阿布来提,佘冬立,张文娟,夏永秋.抑制剂对淹水土壤反硝化和氨挥发的影响[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(12):5191-5199.
作者姓名:阿力木·阿布来提  佘冬立  张文娟  夏永秋
作者单位:1. 河海大学农业工程学院, 江苏 南京 210098; 2. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210008
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41471238);江苏省水利科技项目(2018051);江苏省国土科技项目(2017032)
摘    要:通过室内培养试验,设置3个硝化抑制剂双氰胺(DCD)(氮肥用量的2.5%(DCD1)、5.0%(DCD2)、7.5%(DCD3)),3个脲酶抑制剂氢醌(HQ)(氮肥用量的0.1%(HQ1)、0.3%(HQ2)、0.5%(HQ3))和3个硝化抑制剂DCD+脲酶抑制剂HQ联合施用(氮肥用量的2.5%+0.1%(HH1)、5.0%+0.3%(HH2)、7.5%+0.5%(HH3))试验处理,探讨抑制剂联合施用对淹水土壤反硝化和氨挥发过程及其环境因子的影响,并借助通径分析探讨环境因子对反硝化和氨挥发过程的影响程度,探求抑制剂、氮素转化过程及其环境因子之间定量影响关系.结果表明,单独施用硝化抑制剂DCD能显著减少反硝化速率,但是增加氨挥发损失.单独施用脲酶抑制剂HQ能不同程度减少氨挥发损失,但对反硝化作用效果不稳定.而联合施用DCD和HQ,尤其是HH2(5.0%的DCD+0.3%的HQ)联合施用可有效地同时抑制反硝化和氨挥发损失,相比CK,其反硝化和氨挥发速率分别减少31.3%和12.5%.通径分析发现,硝化抑制剂DCD和脲酶抑制HQ主要影响土体NO3--N和NH4+-N浓度、上覆水体NH4+-N和DON浓度,从而影响反硝化和氨挥发速率.

关 键 词:双氰胺  氢醌  反硝化  氨挥发  环境因子  通径分析  
收稿时间:2019-05-10

Effects of inhibitors on denitrification and ammonia volatilization in submerged soils
A Limu·A Bulaiti,SHE Dong-li,ZHANG Wen-juan,XIA Yong-qiu.Effects of inhibitors on denitrification and ammonia volatilization in submerged soils[J].China Environmental Science,2019,39(12):5191-5199.
Authors:A Limu·A Bulaiti  SHE Dong-li  ZHANG Wen-juan  XIA Yong-qiu
Institution:1. College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
Abstract:Three nitrification inhibitors treatments,2.5% (DCD1), 5.0%(DCD2) and 7.5%(DCD3) of nitrogen fertilizer application, and three urease inhibitors treatments, 0.1% (HQ1), 0.3%(HQ2), 0.5%(HQ3) of nitrogen fertilizer application, and three combined nitrification and urease inhibitors treatments, 2.5%+0.1% (HH1), 5.0%+0.3%(HH2), 7.5%+0.5% (HH3), were experimented in this study to investigate the influence of inhibitors on denitrification and ammonia volatilization losses in laboratory experiment. The quantitative influence relationship among inhibitors, nitrogen losses (denitrification and ammonia volatilization) and environmental factors were further explored using path analysis method. The results showed that application of dicyandiamide alone could significantly inhibit denitrification loss, but increase NH3 volatilization. Application of hydroquinone alone could effectively inhibit NH3 volatilization, but had ineffective effects on denitrification loss. Combined application of dicyandiamide and hydroquinone significantly inhibited both denitrification loss and ammonia volatilization, especially at HH2 (5.0% dicyandiamide +0.3% hydroquinone. Compared to CK, HH2 decreased the denitrification and ammonia volatilization losses by 31.3% and 12.5%, respectively. Path analysis showed that dicyandiamide and hydroquinone mainly decreased the sediment NO3--N, sediment NH+ 4-N, overlying water NH+ 4-N and overlying water DON concentration, and thus decreased denitrification and ammonia volatilization rate.
Keywords:dicyandiamide  hydroquinone  denitrification  ammonia volatilization  environmental factors  path analysis  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号