首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于生物毒性的松花江氨氮水质评价
引用本文:张铃松,王业耀,孟凡生,刘廷良,周岳溪.基于生物毒性的松花江氨氮水质评价[J].环境科学研究,2012,25(12):1344-1350.
作者姓名:张铃松  王业耀  孟凡生  刘廷良  周岳溪
作者单位:1. 北京师范大学水科学研究院,北京 100875;中国环境科学研究院,环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室,北京100012
2. 北京师范大学水科学研究院,北京 100875;中国环境监测总站,北京100012
3. 中国环境科学研究院,环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室,北京100012
4. 中国环境监测总站,北京,100012
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项
摘    要:以US EPA(美国国家环境保护局)保护淡水水生生物的氨氮基准为基础,建立了基于生物毒性的氨氮水质评价流程,对松花江2003-2010年17个监测断面的氨氮进行了水质评价并提出不同评价结果的应对措施.结果表明,松花江干流水质整体较好.按变化趋势来看各断面水质呈逐渐好转的趋势,干流有5个断面在4个评价周期内的评价结果均为A,有2个断面水质评价结果分别由C1、B1好转为A,有4个断面在4个评价周期内有超标情况发生;支流有2个断面在4个评价周期内的评价结果为A,其余4个断面的氨氮污染负荷较高,呈不同程度的超标情况.按超标断面的河段分布来看,松花江氨氮水质指标呈干流好于支流,上游好于中、下游,丰、平水期好于枯水期的特点.SHJC(松花江村)至HLHX(呼兰河下)断面范围内的超标可能是由于城市密集、工农业发达、氨氮产生负荷较高所造成的;JMSS(佳木斯上)至TJ(同江)断面主要受到pH等水质因子的影响,使该河段范围内仍然存在一定的超标现象.

关 键 词:氨氮  水质评价  水生生物  基准连续浓度  基准最大浓度
收稿时间:2012/5/21 0:00:00
修稿时间:2012/8/31 0:00:00

Water Quality Assessment of Ammonia to Aquatic Life in Songhua River
ZHANG Ling-song,WANG Ye-yao,MENG Fan-sheng,LIU Ting-liang and ZHOU Yue-xi.Water Quality Assessment of Ammonia to Aquatic Life in Songhua River[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2012,25(12):1344-1350.
Authors:ZHANG Ling-song  WANG Ye-yao  MENG Fan-sheng  LIU Ting-liang and ZHOU Yue-xi
Institution:College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;China National Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012, China;State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;China National Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100012, China;College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Abstract:A water quality ammonia assessment procedure was proposed based on criteria published by the US EPA to protect aquatic species in freshwater. The methods were applied to the monitoring of ammonia at seventeen sites in the Songhua River from 2003 to 2010. The results showed that the water quality of the main stream of Songhua River was good in general. During the four assessment periods, the water quality class for ammonia was as follows:for the main stream, five sites were class A, two sites improved from class C1 and B1 to A, and another four sites exceeded the ammonia standard. As for the branch stream, two sites were class A, while the remaining four sites suffered to different degrees from the overloading of contamination caused by ammonia. As for the spatial distribution of the monitoring sites, the water quality of Songhua River with respect to ammonia in the main stream was better than that in the branches, while the conditions upstream were better than those in the midstream or downstream. Regarding temporal distribution, the wet season and the normal season were better than the dry season. The study suggests that the causes of nonattainment of the ammonia standard in the SHJC and HLHX sites were probably population expansion and pollutant discharge from the agriculture industry. The nonattainment of the ammonia standard from the JMSS site to the TJ site was mainly due to hydraulic factors such as the effect of pH, though these sites were not seriously affected by disturbance from human activities.
Keywords:ammonia  water quality assessment  aquatic life  criterion continuous concentration  criterion maximum concentration
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号