首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

三峡水库试验性蓄水前后大宁河富营养化状态比较
引用本文:张佳磊,郑丙辉,刘录三,王丽婧,吴光应.三峡水库试验性蓄水前后大宁河富营养化状态比较[J].环境科学,2012,33(10):3382-3389.
作者姓名:张佳磊  郑丙辉  刘录三  王丽婧  吴光应
作者单位:1. 中国环境科学研究院,环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室,北京100012 中国环境科学研究院国家环境保护饮用水水源地保护重点实验室,北京100012
2. 中国环境科学研究院,环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室,北京100012
3. 巫山县环境监测站,巫山,404700
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2009ZX07528-003); 国际科技合作计划项目(2007DFA90510)
摘    要:基于大宁河试验性蓄水阶段(2005-09~2007-09)和正常运行阶段(2008-09~2010-09)的监测数据,对大宁河试验性蓄水前后富营养化状态进行比较,在此基础上运用Carlson的"二维坐标理论"和数理统计分析方法,探究大宁河富营养状态限制因素.结果表明,和试验性蓄水阶段相比,正常运行阶段整个研究区域TSITP呈显著上升趋势,从大宁河回水末端至长江干流,增加幅度沿程依次为23.29%、19.57%、15.58%和14.12%;TSISD和TSITN维持稳定;TSICHL总体维持稳定,仅回水末端(S1)呈上升趋势,上升幅度为17.34%.从长江干流至大宁河回水末端,TSITN、TSITP和TSISD这3个营养状态指数均呈现沿程降低的趋势;TSICHL呈现回水区(S2)和出水口(S3)较高,长江干流(S4)和回水末端(S1)较低.试验性蓄水前后各水文期特征基本呈现一致.TSITN和TSITP水文期特征表现为:汛限期、泄水期>高水位运行期>蓄水期;TSICHL水文期特征表现为:汛限期>蓄水期、泄水期>高水位运行期;TSISD水文期特征表现为:汛限期、泄水期>蓄水期>高水位运行期.正常运行期和试验性蓄水期相比,TSITN、TSITP和TSICHL在各个水文期之间的差异变小.长江干流和大宁河总氮和总磷已经超过了富营养化状态的临界值,因此营养盐并不是水体富营养化状态的限制因素;非藻类浊度控制水下光衰减而成为限制藻类生产力的关键因素.非藻类浊度和水下光照分布受到水文学特征季节动态的强烈干扰.

关 键 词:富营养化指数  水文特征  “二维坐标理论”  大宁河  三峡水库
收稿时间:2011/11/2 0:00:00
修稿时间:2012/3/25 0:00:00

Comparison of Trophic Status Analysis of the Daning River Within the Three Gorges Reservoir Before and After Experimental Impoundment
ZHANG Jia-lei,ZHENG Bing-hui,LIU Lu-san,WANG Li-jing and WU Guang-ying.Comparison of Trophic Status Analysis of the Daning River Within the Three Gorges Reservoir Before and After Experimental Impoundment[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2012,33(10):3382-3389.
Authors:ZHANG Jia-lei  ZHENG Bing-hui  LIU Lu-san  WANG Li-jing and WU Guang-ying
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Source Protection,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Source Protection,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Source Protection,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;Environmental Monitoring Station of Wushan,Wushan 404700, China
Abstract:
Keywords:trophic state indices  hydrological factors  two-dimensional graphical approach  Daning River  Three Gorges Reservoir
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号