首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

广东省土壤Cd含量空间分布预测
引用本文:孙慧,郭治兴,郭颖,袁宇志,柴敏,毕如田,杨静.广东省土壤Cd含量空间分布预测[J].环境科学,2017,38(5):2111-2124.
作者姓名:孙慧  郭治兴  郭颖  袁宇志  柴敏  毕如田  杨静
作者单位:山西农业大学资源环境学院, 晋中 030800;广东省生态环境技术研究所, 广东省农业环境综合治理重点实验室, 广州 510650,广东省生态环境技术研究所, 广东省农业环境综合治理重点实验室, 广州 510650,山西农业大学资源环境学院, 晋中 030800;广东省生态环境技术研究所, 广东省农业环境综合治理重点实验室, 广州 510650,广东省生态环境技术研究所, 广东省农业环境综合治理重点实验室, 广州 510650,广东省生态环境技术研究所, 广东省农业环境综合治理重点实验室, 广州 510650,山西农业大学资源环境学院, 晋中 030800,山西农业大学资源环境学院, 晋中 030800
基金项目:广东省科技计划项目(2015B070701017,2014A040401059,2015A030401068);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41601558);广东省科学院创新平台建设专项
摘    要:土壤重金属的空间格局对土壤重金属污染防治具有重要的指导意义.本文以广东省土壤Cd含量为研究对象,基于"规则"模型——Cubist以及样条插值法、反距离加权法、自然邻域法、普通克里金插值法、局部多项式插值法和径向基函数插值法等6种GIS空间插值方法,选取2 000、1 500、1 000、800、500、300、200、150及90 m这9个不同的格网尺度,构建Cd含量空间格局模型.选择不同方法的最佳预测尺度和最优模型参数,预测广东省土壤Cd含量分布.结果表明:(1)在相同尺度时Cubist方法预测结果都比传统的空间插值结果精度高,格网大小为300 m×300 m时预测精度最高.其次是样条插值法,其在1 500 m插值尺度上精度最高;(2)Cubist模型同时可以识别土壤Cd含量空间分布的驱动因子.结果表明在37个影响Cd含量的自然和人为因子中,地质类型是驱动广东省土壤Cd含量分布差异的主要因子;(3)Cd含量高值主要分布在珠三角地区及粤北少部分地区.广东省土壤Cd含量超过GB 15618~(-1)995中3级和2级标准,即大于1.0 mg·kg~(-1)和0.3 mg·kg~(-1)的面积分别约为160 km~2和2 140 km~2,约占广东省总面积的0.09%和1.18%.

关 键 词:空间分布  土壤Cd含量  广东  Cubist  驱动因子
收稿时间:2016/11/1 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/12/2 0:00:00

Prediction of Distribution of Soil Cd Concentrations in Guangdong Province, China
SUN Hui,GUO Zhi-xing,GUO Ying,YUAN Yu-zhi,CHAI Min,BI Ru-tian and YANG Jing.Prediction of Distribution of Soil Cd Concentrations in Guangdong Province, China[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2017,38(5):2111-2124.
Authors:SUN Hui  GUO Zhi-xing  GUO Ying  YUAN Yu-zhi  CHAI Min  BI Ru-tian and YANG Jing
Institution:College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agriculture University, Jinzhong 030800, China;Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment Integrated Control, Guangdong Institute of Eco-Environmental Science & Technology, Guangzhou 510650, China,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment Integrated Control, Guangdong Institute of Eco-Environmental Science & Technology, Guangzhou 510650, China,College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agriculture University, Jinzhong 030800, China;Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment Integrated Control, Guangdong Institute of Eco-Environmental Science & Technology, Guangzhou 510650, China,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment Integrated Control, Guangdong Institute of Eco-Environmental Science & Technology, Guangzhou 510650, China,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment Integrated Control, Guangdong Institute of Eco-Environmental Science & Technology, Guangzhou 510650, China,College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agriculture University, Jinzhong 030800, China and College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agriculture University, Jinzhong 030800, China
Abstract:Heavy metals are one of the principal soil pollution sources. Contaminated soils affect the quality of agricultural products, and then threaten human health. Prediction of the contaminants distribution in the soil is the foundation of pollution evaluation and risk control. A total of 1000 soil profiles were collected to investigate the spatial variation of soil cadmium (Cd) concentration in Guangdong province. These datasets were divided into two groups, about 900 samples for model training and the other 100 for model validation. Six frequently used GIS spatial interpolation methods including Spline, Natural Neighbor, Ordinary Kriging, Inverse Distance Weighted, Local Polynomial Interpolation and Radial Basis Function, and Cubist which is a type of rule-based model were compared to determine their suitability parameters for estimating soil Cd concentration. Nine different resolutions including 2000, 1500, 1000, 800, 500, 300, 200, 150, and 90 m were selected to calculate, evaluate and compare their accuracy. The results showed that, 1 Quantitative assessment of the continuous surfaces showed that there was a large difference in the accuracy of the seven methods. Cubist was superior to GIS-based spatial interpolation methods at all resolutions. Cubist was the best tool for mapping the spatial distribution of Cd in soils with thirty-seven specific predictors relevant to the source and behavior of Cd (parent material, land use, soil type, soil properties, population density, gross domestic product per capita, and the lengths and classes of the roads surrounding the sampling sites, climatic factors, etc.) at 300 m×300 m resolution. The second was Spline, its accuracy was optimal at the 1500 m×1500 m resolution. 2 Results of Cubist suggested that the soil Cd spatial distribution was primarily dependent on the properties of soil regional parent materials. And soil samples with higher Cd concentration mainly located in Carboniferous and Quaternary areas. 3 Spatially, Cd concentrations were higher in the Pearl River Delta region and north of Guangdong Province. Many hotspots existed throughout the Pearl River Delta region due to transportation and pollution of the river. The major anthropogenic inputs of heavy metals to soils and the environment were metalliferous mining and smelting in the north of Guangdong Province. The soil Cd geometric mean concentration of 0.147 mg·kg-1 was lower than that of China, however it varied from zero to 6.056 mg·kg-1. The areas with soil Cd concentrations greater than 1.0 and 3.0 mg·kg-1 were 160 km2 and 2140 km2 respectively, accounting for 0.09% and 1.18% of the total area of Guangdong Province.
Keywords:spatial distribution  soil Cd concentrations  Guangdong  cubist  driving factors
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号