首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

PM2.5在线水溶性离子与滤膜采集-实验室检测的比对分析
引用本文:杨懂艳,刘保献,石爱军,张大伟,丁萌萌,周健楠,富佳明,景宽.PM2.5在线水溶性离子与滤膜采集-实验室检测的比对分析[J].环境科学,2016,37(10):3730-3736.
作者姓名:杨懂艳  刘保献  石爱军  张大伟  丁萌萌  周健楠  富佳明  景宽
作者单位:北京市环境保护监测中心, 大气颗粒物监测技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100048,北京市环境保护监测中心, 大气颗粒物监测技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100048,北京市环境保护监测中心, 大气颗粒物监测技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100048,北京市环境保护监测中心, 大气颗粒物监测技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100048,北京市环境保护监测中心, 大气颗粒物监测技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100048,北京市环境保护监测中心, 大气颗粒物监测技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100048,北京市环境保护监测中心, 大气颗粒物监测技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100048,北京市环境保护监测中心, 大气颗粒物监测技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100048
摘    要:2014年1~12月,使用URG在线及滤膜采集-实验室分析两种方法对北京市大气细颗粒物PM_(2.5)中的水溶性离子进行检测,并对春、夏、秋、冬这4种不同季节下两种测量方法的差异性进行了比对研究.全年测量结果显示,在线URG所获离子总量高于滤膜采集所获离子总量,其中两种方法所测Cl~-、NO_3~-、Mg~(2+)、Ca~(2+)年均浓度差异不大,而在线所测SO_4~(2-)、NH_4~+、Na~+、K~+结果均明显高于滤膜测试结果.4种主要的水溶性离子中SO_4~(2-)、NO_3~-和Cl~-的相关性较好,NH_4~+相关性略差;不同季节两种测量方法所获结果也略有不同,NO_3~-、SO_4~(2-)、Cl-在秋、冬季差异不显著,而NH_4~+仅在冬季拟合性较好.

关 键 词:PM2.5  水溶性离子  在线  手工采样  比对
收稿时间:2016/1/22 0:00:00
修稿时间:5/9/2016 12:00:00 AM

Comparison Test Between On-line Monitoring of Water-soluble Ions and Filter-based Manual Methods for PM2.5
YANG Dong-yan,LIU Bao-xian,SHI Ai-jun,ZHANG Da-wei,DING Meng-meng,ZHOU Jian-nan,FU Jia-ming and JING Kuan.Comparison Test Between On-line Monitoring of Water-soluble Ions and Filter-based Manual Methods for PM2.5[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2016,37(10):3730-3736.
Authors:YANG Dong-yan  LIU Bao-xian  SHI Ai-jun  ZHANG Da-wei  DING Meng-meng  ZHOU Jian-nan  FU Jia-ming and JING Kuan
Institution:Beijing Key Laboratory of Airborne Particulate Matter Monitoring Technology, Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China,Beijing Key Laboratory of Airborne Particulate Matter Monitoring Technology, Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China,Beijing Key Laboratory of Airborne Particulate Matter Monitoring Technology, Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China,Beijing Key Laboratory of Airborne Particulate Matter Monitoring Technology, Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China,Beijing Key Laboratory of Airborne Particulate Matter Monitoring Technology, Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China,Beijing Key Laboratory of Airborne Particulate Matter Monitoring Technology, Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China,Beijing Key Laboratory of Airborne Particulate Matter Monitoring Technology, Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China and Beijing Key Laboratory of Airborne Particulate Matter Monitoring Technology, Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China
Abstract:Concentrations of water-soluble ions were measured in Beijing during 2014 for comparison of URG online monitoring systems and filter-based manual methods. The differences of four main ions components in spring, summer, autumn and winter were compared. The total concentrations of eight ions measured by URG online were higher than those of filter-based manual method. There was no significant differences among the annual concentrations of Cl-,NO3-,Mg2+ and Ca2+ obtained by the two methods, while the concentrations of SO42-,NH4+,Na+,K+ from online were higher than those from filter. NO3-,SO42-,Cl- had good correlations in autumn and winter, and NH4+ only had better fitting performance in winter.
Keywords:PM2  5  water-soluble ions  on-line monitoring  manual sampling  comparison
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号