首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

化学消毒的中和剂对水中内毒素活性检测的影响
引用本文:张灿,刘文君,史云,安代志,白淼,徐稳.化学消毒的中和剂对水中内毒素活性检测的影响[J].环境科学,2015,36(5):1674-1677.
作者姓名:张灿  刘文君  史云  安代志  白淼  徐稳
作者单位:1. 军事医学科学院疾病预防控制所,北京 100071; 清华大学环境学院,北京 100084
2. 清华大学环境学院,北京,100084
3. 军事医学科学院疾病预防控制所,北京,100071
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51378283,50978142,51008303); 北京市自然科学基金项目(8142033)
摘    要:本研究选取化学消毒的常用6种中和剂组氨酸、甘氨酸、抗坏血酸、吐温80、亚硫酸钠和硫代硫酸钠,采用动态浊度鲎试验定量检测样品中内毒素活性,研究中和剂在不同浓度范围内单独使用对内毒素活性检测的影响,旨在优选出适于鲎法检测细菌内毒素的中和剂种类,确定合适的浓度范围.结果表明在0~1.0%浓度范围内,除了甘氨酸和硫代硫酸钠之外,组氨酸、抗坏血酸、吐温80、亚硫酸钠(碱性和中性)均对鲎试验结果有不同程度的干扰,都不能在鲎试验之前作为化学消毒的中和剂.虽然0~1.0%浓度的甘氨酸对鲎试验结果基本无明显影响,但是甘氨酸和戊二醛的中和产物显黄色,所以不适于在光度法鲎试验中用作戊二醛的中和剂.0~1.0%浓度的硫代硫酸钠对鲎试验结果基本无明显干扰,但是当浓度升高至1.0%~5.0%时会对鲎试验结果有一定的抑制作用.与组氨酸、甘氨酸、抗坏血酸、吐温80和亚硫酸钠相比,硫代硫酸钠更适于在内毒素活性检测之前用作消毒剂的中和剂,但是浓度应控制在0.5%范围以内.

关 键 词:中和剂  细菌内毒素  化学消毒  鲎试验  干扰
收稿时间:2014/10/9 0:00:00
修稿时间:2014/12/22 0:00:00

Interference for Various Quench Agents of Chemical Disinfectants on Detection of Endotoxin Activities in Water
ZHANG Can,LIU Wen-jun,SHI Yun,AN Dai-zhi,BAI Miao and XU Wen.Interference for Various Quench Agents of Chemical Disinfectants on Detection of Endotoxin Activities in Water[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2015,36(5):1674-1677.
Authors:ZHANG Can  LIU Wen-jun  SHI Yun  AN Dai-zhi  BAI Miao and XU Wen
Institution:Institute of Disease Control and Prevention, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China;School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;Institute of Disease Control and Prevention, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China;Institute of Disease Control and Prevention, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China;Institute of Disease Control and Prevention, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China;Institute of Disease Control and Prevention, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China
Abstract:The quenching agents such as histidine, glycine, ascorbic acid, Tween-80, sodium sulfite and sodium hyposulfite are commonly used for quenching the residual disinfectant in water. In this paper, in order to select the optimal type and concentration range of quenching agents prior to the Limulus assays, the interference effects of each quenching agent at different concentrations on endotoxin detection were investigated by the Limulus assays of kinetic-turbidity. Our results identified that, as for 0-1.0% concentration of histidine, ascorbic acid, Tween-80, sodium sulfite (pH unadjusted and pH neutral), interference on the Limulus assays was existed. Hence, these quenching agents could not be applied as neutralizers prior to Limulus assays. Although, there was no interference on endotoxin detection for the glycine, a yellow color, developed by the quenching products of glycine and glutaric dialdehyde, contributed to false positive results. Hence, glycine should not be used as quenching agents in Limulus assays for samples containing glutaric dialdehyde. Compared with other quenching agents as histidine, glycine, ascorbic acid, Tween-80, sodium sulfite, 0-1.0% concentration of sodium hyposulfite elicited no obvious interference, while 1.0%-5.0% concentration of sodium hyposulfite illustrated exhibition effect for endotoxin detection. All in all, compared with other quenching agents as histidine, glycine, ascorbic acid, Tween-80 and sodium sulfite, sodium hyposulfite is suitable for quenching chemicals prior to endotoxin detection and less than 0.5% of concentration is allowable.
Keywords:quenching agent  bacterial endotoxin  disinfection  Limulus assay  interference
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号